The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Effects of Diffusion in Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spin-Echo Experiments
Abstract
The spin-echo attenuation by molecular self-diffusion in an inhomogeneous magnetic field has been calculated for three- and four-pulse sequences. The method employed avoids the question of an averaging procedure as discussed by Das and Saha. Experimental measurements yield confirmation of the three-pulse results.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Use of the Stimulated Echo in NMR Diffusion Studies
Tanner, J. E. (1970) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.1673336 · Cited by 1,645
Stejskal, E. O. (1965) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.1696526 · Cited by 894
Quantitative MRI and ultrastructural examination of the cuprizone mouse model of demyelination
Thiessen, J. D., Zhang, Y., Zhang, H., Wang, L., Buist, R., Del Bigio, M. R., Kong, J., Li, X., & Martin, M. (2013) · NMR in Biomedicine · doi:10.1002/nbm.2992 · Cited by 148
Metadata
- Authors
- Woessner, D. E.
- Venue
- The Journal of Chemical Physics
- Publisher
- AIP Publishing
- Published
- 1961-06-01
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 2057-2061
- ISSN
- 0021-9606 (ISSN-L)
- 1089-7690
- OpenAlex
- W2056508187
- Cited by
- 220
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 0.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effects of Diffusion in Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spin-Echo Experiments. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1063/1.1731821
- The paper
- Woessner, D. E. (1961). Effects of Diffusion in Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spin-Echo Experiments. The Journal of Chemical Physics. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1731821
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.