The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Development and Comparison of Two X-Ray Methods for Determining the Crystallinity of Cotton Cellulose
Abstract
Two x-ray methods have been developed for determining the crystallinity of cellulose using a Geiger counter spectrometer. The two methods were applied to six native cotton varieties, to a cross-bred variety, and to two cottons chemically modified with ethylamine. The x-ray scattering curves for each of the nine samples were compared with those from a highly crystalline sample, a cotton hydrolyzed in HCl, and an amorphous cotton sample to provide a relative measure of crystallinity, or crystalline index. With fully corrected data the average crystalline index of the six cotton varieties was found to be 68.3 and 78.7% by the correlation and by integral methods, respectively. The crystalline indices of the remaining samples determined by the correlation and by the integral methods are, respectively, cross-bred cotton (S×P), 54.3 and 77.2%; cotton treated with anhydrous ethylamine, 29.7 and 50.9%; and cotton treated with 75% aqueous ethylamine, 28.3 and 50.3%.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Bunn, C. W., & Alcock, T. C. (1945) · Transactions of the Faraday Society · doi:10.1039/tf9454100317 · Cited by 253
Cited by
Starch granules: structure and biosynthesis
Buléon, A., Colonna, P., Planchot, V., & Ball, S. (1998) · International Journal of Biological Macromolecules · doi:10.1016/s0141-8130(98)00040-3 · Cited by 2,091
Lopez‐Rubio, A., Flanagan, B. M., Gilbert, E. P., & Gidley, M. J. (2008) · Biopolymers · doi:10.1002/bip.21005 · Cited by 719
Structure and properties of high quality natural cellulose fibers from cornstalks
Reddy, N., & Yang, Y. (2005) · Polymer · doi:10.1016/j.polymer.2005.04.073 · Cited by 311
Chapter 5 Starch Gelatinization
Ratnayake, W. S., & Jackson, D. S. (2008) · Advances in Food and Nutrition Research · doi:10.1016/s1043-4526(08)00405-1 · Cited by 266
Polymeric crystallization and condensation of calcium polyphosphate glass
Omelon, S., Baer, A., Coyle, T., Pilliar, R. M., Kandel, R., & Grynpas, M. (2008) · Materials Research Bulletin · doi:10.1016/j.materresbull.2007.02.015 · Cited by 21
Metadata
- Authors
- Wakelin, J. H., Virgin, H. S., & Crystal, E.
- Venue
- Journal of Applied Physics
- Publisher
- AIP Publishing
- Published
- 1959-11-01
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 1654-1662
- ISSN
- 0021-8979 (ISSN-L)
- 1089-7550
- OpenAlex
- W2017657068
- Cited by
- 240
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 4.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Development and Comparison of Two X-Ray Methods for Determining the Crystallinity of Cotton Cellulose. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1063/1.1735031
- The paper
- Wakelin, J. H., Virgin, H. S., & Crystal, E. (1959). Development and Comparison of Two X-Ray Methods for Determining the Crystallinity of Cotton Cellulose. Journal of Applied Physics. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1735031
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.