Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 240

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Crystallography and Domain Walls in Antiferromagnetic NiO Crystals

Slack, Glen A.·1960·Journal of Applied Physics

Abstract

Twin-domain walls in large crystals of antiferromagnetic NiO have been observed by specular reflection in optically polished and annealed crystals. These walls can be moved in annealed crystals by small mechanical stresses (<106 d/cm2) or by moderate magnetic fields (<25 000 oe) to yield completely untwinned crystals. The ease with which a twin wall moves appears to be limited by a spin-rotation energy loss. Crystallographic measurements of the rhombohedral distortion agree with the x-ray data, and verify the [111] antiferromagnetic contraction. The anisotropy in the magnetic susceptibility vs field has been measured for untwinned crystals, and is compared with earlier work.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1063/1.1735895

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 240

Metadata

Authors
Slack, G. A.
Venue
Journal of Applied Physics
Published
1960-09-01
Volume
31
Issue
9
Pages
1571-1582
ISSN
  • 0021-8979 (ISSN-L)
  • 1089-7550
OpenAlex
W2034882285
Cited by
240
References
0
FWCI
5.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Crystallography and Domain Walls in Antiferromagnetic NiO Crystals. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1063/1.1735895
The paper
Slack, G. A. (1960). Crystallography and Domain Walls in Antiferromagnetic NiO Crystals. Journal of Applied Physics. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1735895

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.