The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Electronic Population Analysis on LCAO–MO Molecular Wave Functions. I
Abstract
With increasing availability of good all-electron LCAO MO (LCAO molecular orbital) wave functions for molecules, a systematic procedure for obtaining maximum insight from such data has become desirable. An analysis in quantitative form is given here in terms of breakdowns of the electronic population into partial and total ``gross atomic populations,'' or into partial and total ``net atomic populations'' together with ``overlap populations.'' ``Gross atomic populations'' distribute the electrons almost perfectly among the various AOs (atomic orbitals) of the various atoms in the molecule. From these numbers, a definite figure is obtained for the amount of promotion (e.g., from 2s to 2p) in each atom; and also for the gross charge Q on each atom if the bonds are polar. The total overlap population for any pair of atoms in a molecule is in general made up of positive and negative contributions. If the total overlap population between two atoms is positive, they are bonded; if negative, they are antibonded. Tables of gross atomic populations and overlap populations, also gross atomic charges Q, computed from SCF (self-consistent field) LCAO-MO data on CO and H2O, are given. The amount of s-p promotion is found to be nearly the same for the O atom in CO and in H2O (0.14 electron in CO and 0.15e in H2O). For the C atom in CO it is 0.50e. For the N atom in N2 it is 0.26e according to calculations by Scherr. In spite of very strong polarity in the π bonds in CO, the σ and π overlap populations are very similar to those in N2. In CO the total overlap population for the π electrons is about twice that for the σ electrons. The most easily ionized electrons of CO are in an MO such that its gross atomic population is 94% localized on the carbon atom; these electrons account for the (weak) electron donor properties of CO. A comparison between changes of bond lengths observed on removal of an electron from one or another MO of CO and H2, and corresponding changes in computed overlap populations, shows good correlation. Several other points of interest are discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
te Velde, G., Bickelhaupt, F. M., Baerends, E. J., Fonseca Guerra, C., van Gisbergen, S. J. A., Snijders, J. G., & Ziegler, T. (2001) · Journal of Computational Chemistry · doi:10.1002/jcc.1056 · Cited by 10,152
Iterative partial equalization of orbital electronegativity—a rapid access to atomic charges
Gasteiger, J., & Marsili, M. (1980) · Tetrahedron · doi:10.1016/0040-4020(80)80168-2 · Cited by 4,157
Maximally localized Wannier functions: Theory and applications
Marzari, N., Mostofi, A. A., Yates, J. R., Souza, I., & Vanderbilt, D. (2012) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.84.1419 · Cited by 3,283
The General Utility Lattice Program ( GULP )
Gale, J. D., & Rohl, A. L. (2003) · Molecular Simulation · doi:10.1080/0892702031000104887 · Cited by 2,265
Liu, P., & Rodriguez, J. A. (2005) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja0540019 · Cited by 1,240
Metadata
- Authors
- Mulliken, R. S.
- Venue
- The Journal of Chemical Physics
- Publisher
- AIP Publishing
- Published
- 1955-10-01
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 1833-1840
- ISSN
- 0021-9606 (ISSN-L)
- 1089-7690
- OpenAlex
- W1509345248
- Cited by
- 11,049
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Electronic Population Analysis on LCAO–MO Molecular Wave Functions. I. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1063/1.1740588
- The paper
- Mulliken, R. S. (1955). Electronic Population Analysis on LCAO–MO Molecular Wave Functions. I. The Journal of Chemical Physics. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1740588
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.