The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Theory of Isotropic Hyperfine Interactions in π-Electron Radicals
Abstract
Indirect proton hyperfine interactions in π-electron radicals are first discussed in terms of a hypothetical CH fragment which holds one unpaired π electron and two σ-CH bonding electrons. Molecular orbital theory and valence bond theory yield almost identical results for the unpaired electron density at the proton due to exchange coupling between the π electron and the σ electrons. The unrestricted Hartree-Fock approximation leads to qualitatively similar results. The unpaired electron spin density at the proton tends to be antiparallel to the average spin of the π electron, and this leads to a negative proton hyperfine coupling constant. The theory of indirect proton hyperfine interaction in the CH fragment is generalized to the case of polyatomic π-electron radical systems; e.g., large planar aromatic radicals. In making this generalization there is introduced an unpaired π-electron spin density operator, ρN, where N refers to carbon atom N. Expectation values of the spin density operator ρN are called ``spin densities,'' ρN, and can be positive or negative. In the simple one-electron molecular orbital approximation a π-electron radical always has a positive or zero spin density at carbon atom N, 0≤ρN≤1. In certain π-electron radical systems; e.g., odd-alternate hydrocarbon radicals, the spin densities at certain (unstarred) carbon atoms are negative when the effects of π—π configuration interaction are included in the π-electron wave function. The previously proposed linear relation between the hyperfine splitting due to proton N, aN, and the unpaired spin density on carbon atom N, ρN,aN=QρNis derived under very general conditions. Two basic approximations are necessary in the derivation of this linear relation. First, it is necessary that σ—π exchange interaction can be treated as a first-order perturbation in π-electron systems. Second, it is necessary that the energy of the triplet antibonding state of the C–H bond be much larger than the excitation energies of certain doublet and quartet states of the π electrons. This derivation of the above linear relation makes no restrictive assumptions regarding the degree of π—π or σ—σ configuration interaction. The validity of the above approximations is discussed and illustrated by highly simplified calculations of the proton hyperfine splittings in the allyl radical, assuming the π—π configuration interaction—and hence the negative spin density on the central carbon atom—to be small. Isotropic hyperfine interactions in molecules in liquid solution can also arise from spin-orbital interaction effects, and it is shown that these effects are negligible for proton hyperfine interactions in aromatic radicals.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Improta, R., & Barone, V. (2004) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr960085f · Cited by 323
Gagnon, D. M., Stich, T. A., Mehta, A. P., Abdelwahed, S. H., Begley, T. P., & Britt, R. D. (2018) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/jacs.8b05686 · Cited by 21
Metadata
- Authors
- McConnell, H. M., & Chesnut, D. B.
- Venue
- The Journal of Chemical Physics
- Publisher
- AIP Publishing
- Published
- 1958-01-01
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 107-117
- ISSN
- 0021-9606 (ISSN-L)
- 1089-7690
- OpenAlex
- W2029068256
- Cited by
- 907
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 20.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Theory of Isotropic Hyperfine Interactions in π-Electron Radicals. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1063/1.1744052
- The paper
- McConnell, H. M., & Chesnut, D. B. (1958). Theory of Isotropic Hyperfine Interactions in π-Electron Radicals. The Journal of Chemical Physics. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1744052
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.