The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Additivity Rules for the Estimation of Molecular Properties. Thermodynamic Properties
Abstract
A general limiting law is proposed which can be used to systematize the various laws of additivity of molecular properties. This can be stated as follows: ``If φ is a molecular property, then for the disproportionation reaction: RNR+SNS⇄2RNS, Δφ→0 as the separation between R and S becomes large compared to their dimensions. It is shown that the zero-order approximation is equivalent to the law of additivity of atomic properties, the first-order approximation to the law of additivity of bond properties, the second-order approximation to the law of additivity of group properties, and so forth. It is shown that for Cp and S° (ideal gases), the additivity of atomic properties works to about ±2 cal/mole-°K, while the additivity of bond properties is usually good to about ±1 cal/mole-°K. The latter also estimates ΔHf° to about ±3 kcal/mole. The group additivity relation is generally obeyed to within ±0.5 cal/mole-°K for Cp and S° and about ±0.6 kcal/mole for ΔHf°. Tables are presented for each of the partial properties at 25°C. The agreements found for the various additivity rules is examined from a molecular point of view and certain extensions and limitations indicated. The application and utility of the rules in estimation of thermodynamic properties is discussed. The estimation of bond dissociation energies is possible with the additivity rules as are the thermodynamic properties of free radicals. An application of the rules to species NR2 and NS2 show that R and S may be ordered according to their general bond-weakening or bond-strengthening properties. For systems where N is C2H4 it is shown that the first and second bond dissociation energies for RC2H4R is very likely a constant = 59.5 kcal, the excitation energy of C2H4.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Reaction Mechanism Generator: Automatic construction of chemical kinetic mechanisms
Gao, C. W., Allen, J. W., Green, W. H., & West, R. H. (2016) · Computer Physics Communications · doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2016.02.013 · Cited by 803
Gómez, J., Hilser, V. J., Xie, D., & Freire, E. (1995) · Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.340220410 · Cited by 428
Reaction Mechanism Generator v3.0: Advances in Automatic Mechanism Generation
Liu, M., Grinberg Dana, A., Johnson, M. S., Goldman, M. J., Jocher, A., Payne, A. M., Grambow, C. A., Han, K., Yee, N. W., Mazeau, E. J., et al. (2021) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/acs.jcim.0c01480 · Cited by 319
Building large microkinetic models with first-principles׳ accuracy at reduced computational cost
Sutton, J. E., & Vlachos, D. G. (2015) · Chemical Engineering Science · doi:10.1016/j.ces.2014.09.011 · Cited by 81
Kinetic Evidence Concerning the Geometry of Substituted Methyl Radicals
Benson, S. W., Golden, D. M., & Egger, K. W. (1965) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.1695930 · Cited by 9
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Benson, S. W., & Buss, J. H.
- Venue
- The Journal of Chemical Physics
- Publisher
- AIP Publishing
- Published
- 1958-09-01
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 546-572
- ISSN
- 0021-9606 (ISSN-L)
- 1089-7690
- OpenAlex
- W2079346192
- Cited by
- 777
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Additivity Rules for the Estimation of Molecular Properties. Thermodynamic Properties. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1063/1.1744539
- The paper
- Benson, S. W., & Buss, J. H. (1958). Additivity Rules for the Estimation of Molecular Properties. Thermodynamic Properties. The Journal of Chemical Physics. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1744539
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.