The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Asymptotic correction of the exchange–correlation kernel of time-dependent density functional theory for long-range charge-transfer excitations
Open accessAbstract
Time-dependent density functional theory (TDDFT) calculations of charge-transfer excitation energies ωCT are significantly in error when the adiabatic local density approximation (ALDA) is employed for the exchange–correlation kernel fxc. We relate the error to the physical meaning of the orbital energy of the Kohn–Sham lowest unoccupied molecular orbital (LUMO). The LUMO orbital energy in Kohn–Sham DFT—in contrast to the Hartree–Fock model—approximates an excited electron, which is correct for excitations in compact molecules. In CT transitions the energy of the LUMO of the acceptor molecule should instead describe an added electron, i.e., approximate the electron affinity. To obtain a contribution that compensates for the difference, a specific divergence of fxc is required in rigorous TDDFT, and a suitable asymptotically correct form of the kernel fxcasymp is proposed. The importance of the asymptotic correction of fxc is demonstrated with the calculation of ωCT(R) for the prototype diatomic system HeBe at various separations R(He–Be). The TDDFT–ALDA curve ωCT(R) roughly resembles the benchmark ab initio curve ωCTCISD(R) of a configuration interaction calculation with single and double excitations in the region R=1–1.5 Å, where a sizable He–Be interaction exists, but exhibits the wrong behavior ωCT(R)≪ωCTCISD(R) at large R. The TDDFT curve obtained with fxcasymp however approaches ωCTCISD(R) closely in the region R=3–10 Å. Then, the adequate rigorous TDDFT approach should interpolate between the LDA/GGA ALDA xc kernel for excitations in compact systems and fxcasymp for weakly interacting fragments and suitable interpolation expressions are considered.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Single-Reference ab Initio Methods for the Calculation of Excited States of Large Molecules
Dreuw, A., & Head-Gordon, M. (2005) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr0505627 · Cited by 2,722
Laurent, A. D., & Jacquemin, D. (2013) · International Journal of Quantum Chemistry · doi:10.1002/qua.24438 · Cited by 1,382
Zhao, Y., & Truhlar, D. G. (2006) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry A · doi:10.1021/jp066479k · Cited by 1,316
Gómez-Bombarelli, R., Aguilera-Iparraguirre, J., Hirzel, T. D., Duvenaud, D., Maclaurin, D., Blood-Forsythe, M. A., Chae, H. S., Einzinger, M., Ha, D.-G., Wu, T., et al. (2016) · Nature Materials · doi:10.1038/nmat4717 · Cited by 1,060
Improta, R., Santoro, F., & Blancafort, L. (2016) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00444 · Cited by 499
Metadata
- Authors
- Gritsenko, O., & Baerends, E. J.
- Venue
- The Journal of Chemical Physics
- Publisher
- AIP Publishing
- Published
- 2004-06-24
- Volume
- 121
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 655-660
- ISSN
- 0021-9606 (ISSN-L)
- 1089-7690
- OpenAlex
- W2396016254
- Cited by
- 349
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 17.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Asymptotic correction of the exchange–correlation kernel of time-dependent density functional theory for long-range charge-transfer excitations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1063/1.1759320
- The paper
- Gritsenko, O., & Baerends, E. J. (2004). Asymptotic correction of the exchange–correlation kernel of time-dependent density functional theory for long-range charge-transfer excitations. The Journal of Chemical Physics. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1759320
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.