The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Exact decoupling of the Dirac Hamiltonian. I. General theory
Open accessAbstract
Exact decoupling of positive- and negative-energy states in relativistic quantum chemistry is discussed in the framework of unitary transformation techniques. The obscure situation that each scheme of decoupling transformations relies on different, but very special parametrizations of the employed unitary matrices is critically analyzed. By applying the most general power series ansatz for the parametrization of the unitary matrices it is shown that all transformation protocols for decoupling the Dirac Hamiltonian have necessarily to start with an initial free-particle Foldy–Wouthuysen step. The purely numerical iteration scheme applying X-operator techniques to the Barysz–Sadlej–Snijders (BSS) Hamiltonian is compared to the analytical schemes of the Foldy–Wouthuysen (FW) and Douglas–Kroll–Hess (DKH) approaches. Relying on an illegal 1/c expansion of the Dirac Hamiltonian around the nonrelativistic limit, any higher-order FW transformation is in principle ill defined and doomed to fail, irrespective of the specific features of the external potential. It is shown that the DKH method is the only valid analytic unitary transformation scheme for the Dirac Hamiltonian. Its exact infinite-order version can be realized purely numerically by the BSS scheme, which is only able to yield matrix representations of the decoupled Hamiltonian but no analytic expressions for this operator. It is explained why a straightforward numerical iterative extension of the DKH procedure to arbitrary order employing matrix representations is not feasible within standard one-component electronic structure programs. A more sophisticated ansatz based on a symbolical evaluation of the DKH operators via a suitable parser routine is needed instead and introduced in Part II of this work.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The quantum theory of the electron
Dirac, P. A. M. (1928) · Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Containing Papers of a Mathematical and Physical Character · doi:10.1098/rspa.1928.0023 · Cited by 3,657
Cited by
Self-consistent-field calculations of core excited states
Besley, N. A., Gilbert, A. T. B., & Gill, P. M. W. (2009) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.3092928 · Cited by 329
The Douglas–Kroll–Hess Approach
Nakajima, T., & Hirao, K. (2012) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr200040s · Cited by 283
Hard-X-Ray-Induced Multistep Ultrafast Dissociation
Travnikova, O., Marchenko, T., Goldsztejn, G., Jänkälä, K., Sisourat, N., Carniato, S., Guillemin, R., Journel, L., Céolin, D., Püttner, R., et al. (2016) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.116.213001 · Cited by 49
Metadata
- Authors
- Reiher, M., & Wolf, A.
- Venue
- The Journal of Chemical Physics
- Publisher
- AIP Publishing
- Published
- 2004-08-01
- Volume
- 121
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 2037-2047
- ISSN
- 0021-9606 (ISSN-L)
- 1089-7690
- OpenAlex
- W2024970531
- Cited by
- 500
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 5.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Exact decoupling of the Dirac Hamiltonian. I. General theory. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1063/1.1768160
- The paper
- Reiher, M., & Wolf, A. (2004). Exact decoupling of the Dirac Hamiltonian. I. General theory. The Journal of Chemical Physics. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1768160
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.