Cited by 9Thermal properties of materialsHeat Transfer and Numerical MethodsMechanical and Thermal Properties Analysis

An effective thermal conductivity measurement system

Madrid, F., Jordà, X., Vellvehi, M., Guraya, C., Coleto, J., Rebollo, J.·2004·Review of Scientific Instruments

Abstract

In the technical literature, there is a lack of reliable thermal parameters and, often, it is necessary to do in situ measurements for every particular material. An effective thermal conductivity measurement system has been designed and implemented to provide reliable and accurate values for that thermal parameter. The thermal conductivity of a given material is deduced from thermal resistance differential measurements of two samples. All parts of the implemented system as well as practical and theoretical solutions are described, including a power controller circuit exclusively conceived for this application. Experimental considerations to reduce the measurement error are exposed, as well as some results obtained for three different materials.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1063/1.1795071

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Heat flow through MLI blankets can be calculated by using a calibrated rod provided that the cold boundary exchanges heat with the calibrated rod and 1st stage thermal shield only.

    “As is shown in figure 1, heat flow through MLI blankets can be calculated by using a calibrated rod provided that the cold boundary exchange heat with calibrated rod and 1 st stage thermal shield only.”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Madrid, F., Jordà, X., Vellvehi, M., Guraya, C., Coleto, J., & Rebollo, J.
Affiliations
  • Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (ES)
  • FUNDACION INASMET Mikeletegi Pasealekua, 2, Parque Tecnológico-Teknologi Parkea, E-20009 Donostia-San Sebastián (Gipuzkoa), Spain
Venue
Review of Scientific Instruments
Published
2004-11-01
Volume
75
Issue
11
Pages
4505-4510
ISSN
  • 0034-6748 (ISSN-L)
  • 1089-7623
OpenAlex
W2060886014
Cited by
9
References
0
Citations by year
2019: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2
FWCI
0.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Review of Scientific Instruments (publishedVersion)
  • TECNALIA Publications (Fundación TECNALIA Research & Innovation) (submittedVersion, public-domain)
Funders
Comisión Interministerial de Ciencia y Tecnología
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Thermal properties of materials
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Computational Mechanics › Heat Transfer and Numerical Methods
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Mechanical and Thermal Properties Analysis
Keywords
effective thermal conductivity, thermal conductivity measurement, thermal resistance, measurement error reduction, in situ thermal measurement

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review