The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Charge-on-spring polarizable water models revisited: From water clusters to liquid water to ice
Abstract
The properties of two improved versions of charge-on-spring (COS) polarizable water models (COS/G2 and COS/G3) that explicitly include nonadditive polarization effects are reported. In COS models, the polarization is represented via a self-consistently induced dipole moment consisting of a pair of separated charges. A previous polarizable water model (COS/B2), upon which the improved versions are based, was developed by Yu, Hansson, and van Gunsteren [J. Chem. Phys. 118, 221 (2003)]. To improve the COS/B2 model, which overestimated the dielectric permittivity, one additional virtual atomic site was used to reproduce the water monomer quadrupole moments besides the water monomer dipole moment in the gas phase. The molecular polarizability, residing on the virtual atomic site, and Lennard-Jones parameters for oxygen-oxygen interactions were varied to reproduce the experimental values for the heat of vaporization and the density of liquid water at room temperature and pressure. The improved models were used to study the properties of liquid water at various thermodynamic states as well as gaseous water clusters and ice. Overall, good agreement is obtained between simulated properties and those derived from experiments and ab initio calculations. The COS/G2 and COS/G3 models may serve as simple, classical, rigid, polarizable water models for the study of organic solutes and biopolymers. Due to its simplicity, COS type of polarization can straightforwardly be used to introduce explicit polarization into (bio)molecular force fields.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Computer Simulation of Liquids
Allen, M. P., & Tildesley, D. J. (2017) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198803195.001.0001 · Cited by 20,945
Cited by
Simulating water with rigid non-polarizable models: a general perspective
Vega, C., & Abascal, J. L. F. (2011) · Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics · doi:10.1039/c1cp22168j · Cited by 991
How Water’s Properties Are Encoded in Its Molecular Structure and Energies
Brini, E., Fennell, C. J., Fernandez-Serra, M., Hribar-Lee, B., Lukšič, M., & Dill, K. A. (2017) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00259 · Cited by 518
Modeling Molecular Interactions in Water: From Pairwise to Many-Body Potential Energy Functions
Cisneros, G. A., Wikfeldt, K. T., Ojamäe, L., Lu, J., Xu, Y., Torabifard, H., Bartók, A. P., Csányi, G., Molinero, V., & Paesani, F. (2016) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00644 · Cited by 438
QM/MM Methods for Biological Systems
Senn, H. M., & Thiel, W. (2006) · Topics in Current Chemistry · doi:10.1007/128_2006_084 · Cited by 428
Classical Electrostatics for Biomolecular Simulations
Cisneros, G. A., Karttunen, M., Ren, P., & Sagui, C. (2014) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr300461d · Cited by 259
Metadata
- Authors
- Yu, H., & van Gunsteren, W. F.
- Venue
- The Journal of Chemical Physics
- Publisher
- AIP Publishing
- Published
- 2004-11-15
- Volume
- 121
- Issue
- 19
- Pages
- 9549-9564
- ISSN
- 0021-9606 (ISSN-L)
- 1089-7690
- OpenAlex
- W2077964123
- Cited by
- 200
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 6.90
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Charge-on-spring polarizable water models revisited: From water clusters to liquid water to ice. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1063/1.1805516
- The paper
- Yu, H., & van Gunsteren, W. F. (2004). Charge-on-spring polarizable water models revisited: From water clusters to liquid water to ice. The Journal of Chemical Physics. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1805516
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.