Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,676

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A modified TIP3P water potential for simulation with Ewald summation

Price, Daniel J., Brooks, Charles L.·2004·The Journal of Chemical Physics

Abstract

The charges and Lennard-Jones parameters of the TIP3P water potential have been modified to improve its performance under the common condition for molecular dynamics simulations of using Ewald summation in lieu of relatively short nonbonded truncation schemes. These parameters were optimized under the condition that the hydrogen atoms do not have Lennard-Jones parameters, thus making the model independent of the combining rules used for the calculation of nonbonded, heteroatomic interaction energies, and limiting the number of Lennard-Jones calculations required. Under these conditions, this model provides accurate density (ρ=0.997 g/ml) and heat of vaporization (ΔHvap=10.53 kcal/mol) at 25 °C and 1 atm, but also provides improved structure in the second peak of the O–O radial distribution function and improved values for the dielectric constant (ε0=89) and the diffusion coefficient (D=4.0×10−5 cm2/s) relative to the original parametrization. Like the original parameterization, however, this model does not show a temperature density maximum. Several similar models are considered with the additional constraint of trying to match the performance of the optimized potentials for liquid simulation atom force field to that obtained when using the simulation conditions under which it was originally designed, but no model was entirely satisfactory in reproducing the relative difference in free energies of hydration between the model compounds, phenol and benzene. Finally, a model that incorporates a long-range correction for truncated Lennard-Jones interactions is presented, which provides a very accurate dielectric constant (ε0=76), however, the improvement in this estimate is on the same order as the uncertainty in the calculation.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1063/1.1808117

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 1,676

Metadata

Authors
Price, D. J., & Brooks, C. L.
Venue
The Journal of Chemical Physics
Published
2004-11-22
Volume
121
Issue
20
Pages
10096-10103
ISSN
  • 0021-9606 (ISSN-L)
  • 1089-7690
OpenAlex
W2038532826
Cited by
1,676
References
1
FWCI
4.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A modified TIP3P water potential for simulation with Ewald summation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1063/1.1808117
The paper
Price, D. J., & Brooks, C. L. (2004). A modified TIP3P water potential for simulation with Ewald summation. The Journal of Chemical Physics. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1808117

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.