The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Comparison of methods for finding saddle points without knowledge of the final states
Abstract
Within the harmonic approximation to transition state theory, the biggest challenge involved in finding the mechanism or rate of transitions is the location of the relevant saddle points on the multidimensional potential energy surface. The saddle point search is particularly challenging when the final state of the transition is not specified. In this article we report on a comparison of several methods for locating saddle points under these conditions and compare, in particular, the well-established rational function optimization (RFO) methods using either exact or approximate Hessians with the more recently proposed minimum mode following methods where only the minimum eigenvalue mode is found, either by the dimer or the Lanczos method. A test problem involving transitions in a seven-atom Pt island on a Pt(111) surface using a simple Morse pairwise potential function is used and the number of degrees of freedom varied by varying the number of movable atoms. In the full system, 175 atoms can move so 525 degrees of freedom need to be optimized to find the saddle points. For testing purposes, we have also restricted the number of movable atoms to 7 and 1. Our results indicate that if attempting to make a map of all relevant saddle points for a large system (as would be necessary when simulating the long time scale evolution of a thermal system) the minimum mode following methods are preferred. The minimum mode following methods are also more efficient when searching for the lowest saddle points in a large system, and if the force can be obtained cheaply. However, if only the lowest saddle points are sought and the calculation of the force is expensive but a good approximation for the Hessian at the starting position of the search can be obtained at low cost, then the RFO approaches employing an approximate Hessian represent the preferred choice. For small and medium sized systems where the force is expensive to calculate, the RFO approaches employing an approximate Hessian is also the more efficient, but when the force and Hessian can be obtained cheaply and only the lowest saddle points are sought the RFO approach using an exact Hessian is the better choice. These conclusions have been reached based on a comparison of the total computational effort needed to find the saddle points and the number of saddle points found for each of the methods. The RFO methods do not perform very well with respect to the latter aspect, but starting the searches further away from the initial minimum or using the hybrid RFO version presented here improves this behavior considerably in most cases.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Golub, G. (2012) · doi:10.56021/9781421407944 · Cited by 34,505
Cited by
DL-FIND: An Open-Source Geometry Optimizer for Atomistic Simulations
Kästner, J., Carr, J. M., Keal, T. W., Thiel, W., Wander, A., & Sherwood, P. (2009) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry A · doi:10.1021/jp9028968 · Cited by 658
Adsorption of O2, H2, CO, NH3, and NO2 on ZnO Nanotube: A Density Functional Theory Study
An, W., Wu, X., & Zeng, X. C. (2008) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry C · doi:10.1021/jp711105d · Cited by 318
Surface oxidation energetics and kinetics on MoS2 monolayer
KC, S., Longo, R. C., Wallace, R. M., & Cho, K. (2015) · Journal of Applied Physics · doi:10.1063/1.4916536 · Cited by 262
An, J., Wang, Y., Lu, J., Zhang, J., Zhang, Z., Xu, S., Liu, X., Zhang, T., Gocyla, M., Heggen, M., et al. (2018) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/jacs.8b01742 · Cited by 258
Synergies Between Quantum Mechanics and Machine Learning in Reaction Prediction
Sadowski, P., Fooshee, D., Subrahmanya, N., & Baldi, P. (2016) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/acs.jcim.6b00351 · Cited by 65
Metadata
- Authors
- Olsen, R. A., Kroes, G. J., Henkelman, G., Arnaldsson, A., & Jónsson, H.
- Venue
- The Journal of Chemical Physics
- Publisher
- AIP Publishing
- Published
- 2004-11-22
- Volume
- 121
- Issue
- 20
- Pages
- 9776-9792
- ISSN
- 0021-9606 (ISSN-L)
- 1089-7690
- OpenAlex
- W2127437840
- Cited by
- 552
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 4.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Comparison of methods for finding saddle points without knowledge of the final states. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1063/1.1809574
- The paper
- Olsen, R. A., Kroes, G. J., Henkelman, G., Arnaldsson, A., & Jónsson, H. (2004). Comparison of methods for finding saddle points without knowledge of the final states. The Journal of Chemical Physics. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1809574
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.