Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 856

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Efficient and accurate approximations to the molecular spin-orbit coupling operator and their use in molecular g-tensor calculations

Neese, Frank·2005·The Journal of Chemical Physics

Abstract

Approximations to the Breit-Pauli form of the spin-orbit coupling (SOC) operator are examined. The focus is on approximations that lead to an effective quasi-one-electron operator which leads to efficient property evaluations. In particular, the accurate spin-orbit mean-field (SOMF) method developed by Hess, Marian, Wahlgren, and Gropen is examined in detail. It is compared in detail with the “effective potential” spin-orbit operator commonly used in density functional theory (DFT) and which has been criticized for not including the spin-other orbit (SOO) contribution. Both operators contain identical one-electron and Coulomb terms since the SOO contribution to the Coulomb term vanishes exactly in the SOMF treatment. Since the DFT correlation functional only contributes negligibly to the SOC the only difference between the two operators is in the exchange part. In the SOMF approximation, the SOO part is equal to two times the spin-same orbit contribution. The DFT exchange contribution is of the wrong sign and numerically shown to be in error by a factor of 2–2.5 in magnitude. The simplest possible improvement in the DFT-SOC treatment [Veff(-2X)-SOC] is to multiply the exchange contribution to the Veff operator by −2. This is verified numerically in calculations of molecular g-tensors and one-electron SOC constants of atoms and ions. Four different ways of handling the computationally critical Coulomb part of the SOMF and Veff operators are discussed and implemented. The resolution of the identity approximation is virtually exact for the SOC with standard auxiliary basis sets which need to be slightly augmented by steep s functions for heavier elements. An almost as efficient seminumerical approximation is equally accurate. The effective nuclear charge model gives results within ∼10% (on average) of the SOMF treatment. The one-center approximation to the Coulomb and one-electron SOC terms leads to errors on the order of ∼5%. Small absolute errors are obtained for the one-center approximation to the exchange term which is consequently the method of choice [SOMF(1X)] for large molecules.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1063/1.1829047

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 856

Metadata

Authors
Neese, F.
Venue
The Journal of Chemical Physics
Published
2005-01-03
Volume
122
Issue
3
Pages
34107-34107
ISSN
  • 0021-9606 (ISSN-L)
  • 1089-7690
OpenAlex
W2083354755
Cited by
856
References
0
FWCI
7.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Efficient and accurate approximations to the molecular spin-orbit coupling operator and their use in molecular g-tensor calculations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1063/1.1829047
The paper
Neese, F. (2005). Efficient and accurate approximations to the molecular spin-orbit coupling operator and their use in molecular g-tensor calculations. The Journal of Chemical Physics. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1829047

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.