The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Improved pseudobonds for combined ab initio quantum mechanical/molecular mechanical methods
Abstract
The pseudobond approach offers a smooth connection at the quantum mechanical/molecular mechanical interface which passes through covalent bonds. It replaces the boundary atom of the environment part with a seven-valence-electron atom to form a pseudobond with the boundary atom of the active part [Y. Zhang, T. S. Lee, and W. Yang, J. Chem. Phys. 110, 46 (1999)]. In its original formulation, the seven-valence-electron boundary atom has the basis set of fluorine and a parametrized effective core potential. Up to now, only the Cps(sp3)–C(sp3) pseudobond has been successfully developed; thus in the case of proteins, it can only be used to cut the protein side chains. Here we employ a different formulation to construct this seven-valence-electron boundary atom, which has its own basis set as well as the effective core potential. We have not only further improved Cps(sp3)–C(sp3) pseudobond, but also developed Cps(sp3)–C(sp2,carbonyl) and Cps(sp3)–N(sp3) pseudobonds for the cutting of protein backbones and nucleic acid bases. The basis set and effective core potential for the seven-valence-electron boundary atom are independent of the molecular mechanical force field. Although the parametrization is performed with density functional calculations using hybrid B3LYP exchange-correlation functional, it is found that the same set of parameters is also applicable to Hartree-Fock and MP2 methods, as well as DFT calculations with other exchange-correlation functionals. Tests on a series of molecules yield very good structural, electronic, and energetic results in comparison with the corresponding full ab initio quantum mechanical calculations.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
QM/MM Methods for Biomolecular Systems
Senn, H. M., & Thiel, W. (2009) · Angewandte Chemie International Edition · doi:10.1002/anie.200802019 · Cited by 2,684
QM/MM: what have we learned, where are we, and where do we go from here?
Lin, H., & Truhlar, D. G. (2007) · Theoretical Chemistry Accounts · doi:10.1007/s00214-006-0143-z · Cited by 1,200
QM/MM Methods for Biological Systems
Senn, H. M., & Thiel, W. (2006) · Topics in Current Chemistry · doi:10.1007/128_2006_084 · Cited by 428
Accurate Composite and Fragment-Based Quantum Chemical Models for Large Molecules
Raghavachari, K., & Saha, A. (2015) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr500606e · Cited by 290
Wu, R., Lu, Z., Cao, Z., & Zhang, Y. (2011) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja111104p · Cited by 108
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhang, Y.
- Venue
- The Journal of Chemical Physics
- Publisher
- AIP Publishing
- Published
- 2004-12-23
- Volume
- 122
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 024114-024114
- ISSN
- 0021-9606 (ISSN-L)
- 1089-7690
- OpenAlex
- W2057080843
- Cited by
- 162
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Improved pseudobonds for combined ab initio quantum mechanical/molecular mechanical methods. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1063/1.1834899
- The paper
- Zhang, Y. (2005). Improved pseudobonds for combined ab initio quantum mechanical/molecular mechanical methods. The Journal of Chemical Physics. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1834899
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.