The DOI matches its Crossref record; 21 of the 21 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Accurate hybrid stochastic simulation of a system of coupled chemical or biochemical reactions
Abstract
The dynamical solution of a well-mixed, nonlinear stochastic chemical kinetic system, described by the Master equation, may be exactly computed using the stochastic simulation algorithm. However, because the computational cost scales with the number of reaction occurrences, systems with one or more “fast” reactions become costly to simulate. This paper describes a hybrid stochastic method that partitions the system into subsets of fast and slow reactions, approximates the fast reactions as a continuous Markov process, using a chemical Langevin equation, and accurately describes the slow dynamics using the integral form of the “Next Reaction” variant of the stochastic simulation algorithm. The key innovation of this method is its mechanism of efficiently monitoring the occurrences of slow, discrete events while simultaneously simulating the dynamics of a continuous, stochastic or deterministic process. In addition, by introducing an approximation in which multiple slow reactions may occur within a time step of the numerical integration of the chemical Langevin equation, the hybrid stochastic method performs much faster with only a marginal decrease in accuracy. Multiple examples, including a biological pulse generator and a large-scale system benchmark, are simulated using the exact and proposed hybrid methods as well as, for comparison, a previous hybrid stochastic method. Probability distributions of the solutions are compared and the weak errors of the first two moments are computed. In general, these hybrid methods may be applied to the simulation of the dynamics of a system described by stochastic differential, ordinary differential, and Master equations.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Exact stochastic simulation of coupled chemical reactions
Gillespie, D. T. (1977) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry · doi:10.1021/j100540a008 · Cited by 10,136
Gillespie, D. T. (1976) · Journal of Computational Physics · doi:10.1016/0021-9991(76)90041-3 · Cited by 6,029
Stochastic Gene Expression in a Single Cell
Elowitz, M. B., Levine, A. J., Siggia, E. D., & Swain, P. S. (2002) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1070919 · Cited by 5,441
Numerical solution of stochastic differential equations
(2016) · doi:10.5194/gmd-2016-45-rc1 · Cited by 5,002
Handbook of Stochastic Methods for Physics, Chemistry and the Natural Sciences
Gardiner, C. W. (1985) · Springer Series in Synergetics · doi:10.1007/978-3-662-02452-2 · Cited by 3,703
Approximate accelerated stochastic simulation of chemically reacting systems
Gillespie, D. T. (2001) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.1378322 · Cited by 1,884
Efficient Exact Stochastic Simulation of Chemical Systems with Many Species and Many Channels
Gibson, M. A., & Bruck, J. (2000) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry A · doi:10.1021/jp993732q · Cited by 1,643
The chemical Langevin equation
Gillespie, D. T. (2000) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.481811 · Cited by 1,475
Atkinson, M. R., Savageau, M. A., Myers, J. T., & Ninfa, A. J. (2003) · Cell · doi:10.1016/s0092-8674(03)00346-5 · Cited by 715
Rao, C. V., & Arkin, A. P. (2003) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.1545446 · Cited by 656
Cited by
COPASI—a COmplex PAthway SImulator
Hoops, S., Sahle, S., Gauges, R., Lee, C., Pahle, J., Simus, N., Singhal, M., Xu, L., Mendes, P., & Kummer, U. (2006) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btl485 · Cited by 2,618
From in vivo to in silico biology and back
Di Ventura, B., Lemerle, C., Michalodimitrakis, K., & Serrano, L. (2006) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature05127 · Cited by 290
Virtual Cell modelling and simulation software environment
Moraru, I. I., Schaff, J. C., Slepchenko, B. M., Blinov, M. L., Morgan, F., Lakshminarayana, A., Gao, F., Li, Y., & Loew, L. M. (2008) · IET Systems Biology · doi:10.1049/iet-syb:20080102 · Cited by 236
Simoni, G., Reali, F., Priami, C., & Marchetti, L. (2019) · WIREs Systems Biology and Medicine · doi:10.1002/wsbm.1459 · Cited by 26
McDonnell, A. (2014) · Journal of Behavioral and Brain Science · doi:10.4236/jbbs.2014.47035 · Cited by 6
Metadata
- Authors
- Salis, H., & Kaznessis, Y.
- Venue
- The Journal of Chemical Physics
- Publisher
- AIP Publishing
- Published
- 2005-01-14
- Volume
- 122
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 54103-54103
- ISSN
- 0021-9606 (ISSN-L)
- 1089-7690
- OpenAlex
- W2002083262
- Cited by
- 337
- References
- 21
- FWCI
- 9.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Accurate hybrid stochastic simulation of a system of coupled chemical or biochemical reactions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1063/1.1835951
- The paper
- Salis, H., & Kaznessis, Y. (2005). Accurate hybrid stochastic simulation of a system of coupled chemical or biochemical reactions. The Journal of Chemical Physics. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1835951
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.