The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Electric-field-controlled water and ion permeation of a hydrophobic nanopore
Open accessAbstract
The permeation of hydrophobic, cylindrical nanopores by water molecules and ions is investigated under equilibrium and out-of-equilibrium conditions by extensive molecular-dynamics simulations. Neglecting the chemical structure of the confining pore surface, we focus on the effects of pore radius and electric field on permeation. The simulations confirm the intermittent filling of the pore by water, reported earlier under equilibrium conditions for pore radii larger than a critical radius Rc. Below this radius, water can still permeate the pore under the action of a strong electric field generated by an ion concentration imbalance at both ends of the pore embedded in a structureless membrane. The water driven into the channel undergoes considerable electrostriction characterized by a mean density up to twice the bulk density and by a dramatic drop in dielectric permittivity which can be traced back to a considerable distortion of the hydrogen-bond network inside the pore. The free-energy barrier to ion permeation is estimated by a variant of umbrella sampling for Na+, K+, Ca2+, and Cl− ions, and correlates well with known solvation free energies in bulk water. Starting from an initial imbalance in ion concentration, equilibrium is gradually restored by successive ion passages through the water-filled pore. At each passage the electric field across the pore drops, reducing the initial electrostriction, until the pore, of radius less than Rc, closes to water and hence to ion transport, thus providing a possible mechanism for voltage-dependent gating of hydrophobic pores.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Huang, J., Sumpter, B. G., & Meunier, V. (2008) · Chemistry – A European Journal · doi:10.1002/chem.200800639 · Cited by 630
Theoretical Model for Nanoporous Carbon Supercapacitors
Huang, J., Sumpter, B. G., & Meunier, V. (2008) · Angewandte Chemie International Edition · doi:10.1002/anie.200703864 · Cited by 600
Electrostatic gating of a nanometer water channel
Li, J., Gong, X., Lu, H., Li, D., Fang, H., & Zhou, R. (2007) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0604541104 · Cited by 314
Microscopic Simulations of Electrochemical Double-Layer Capacitors
Jeanmairet, G., Rotenberg, B., & Salanne, M. (2022) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.1c00925 · Cited by 303
Perspectives on external electric fields in molecular simulation: progress, prospects and challenges
English, N. J., & Waldron, C. J. (2015) · Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics · doi:10.1039/c5cp00629e · Cited by 273
Metadata
- Authors
- Dzubiella, J., & Hansen, J.-P.
- Venue
- The Journal of Chemical Physics
- Publisher
- AIP Publishing
- Published
- 2005-06-15
- Volume
- 122
- Issue
- 23
- Pages
- 234706-234706
- ISSN
- 0021-9606 (ISSN-L)
- 1089-7690
- OpenAlex
- W2053882954
- Cited by
- 189
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Electric-field-controlled water and ion permeation of a hydrophobic nanopore. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1063/1.1927514
- The paper
- Dzubiella, J., & Hansen, J.-P. (2005). Electric-field-controlled water and ion permeation of a hydrophobic nanopore. The Journal of Chemical Physics. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1927514
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.