The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Density-functional calculation of CeO2 surfaces and prediction of effects of oxygen partial pressure and temperature on stabilities
Abstract
We have used density-functional theory to investigate (111), (110), (210), (211), (100), and (310) surfaces of ceria (CeO2). Compared with previous interatomic-potential-based studies, our calculations reported a slightly different relative stability ordering and significantly lower surface energies for the stoichiometric surfaces. Using a defect model, the surface stabilities were evaluated as functions of oxygen partial pressure and temperature. Our investigations were restricted to ideal surface terminations, without considering defect formation on those surfaces. We found that at 300K, the stoichiometric (111) has the lowest free energy for a wide range of oxygen partial pressures up to 1atm, and only at ultrahigh vacuum does the Ce-terminated (111) becomes the most stable one. The transition point for the Ce-terminated (111) surfaces moves to higher oxygen partial pressures when temperature increases. To improve the prediction of electron density of states, we used the local-density approximation plus U(J) correction method to correct the on-site Coulomb correlation and exchange interaction due to the strongly localized Ce-4f electrons. The optimal parameter combination of U=7eV and J=0.7eV was found to improve the O2p–Ce4f gap without much degradation of ground-state bulk properties or the O2p–Ce5d gap. The bulk and surface electronic structures were then analyzed based on the improved density of states.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
High-throughput electronic band structure calculations: Challenges and tools
Setyawan, W., & Curtarolo, S. (2010) · Computational Materials Science · doi:10.1016/j.commatsci.2010.05.010 · Cited by 1,692
First-principlesLDA+UandGGA+Ustudy of cerium oxides: Dependence on the effective U parameter
Loschen, C., Carrasco, J., Neyman, K. M., & Illas, F. (2007) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.75.035115 · Cited by 721
Tuning LDA+U for electron localization and structure at oxygen vacancies in ceria
Castleton, C. W. M., Kullgren, J., & Hermansson, K. (2007) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.2800015 · Cited by 377
Modeling ofCeO2,Ce2O3, andCeO2−xin theLDA+Uformalism
Andersson, D. A., Simak, S. I., Johansson, B., Abrikosov, I. A., & Skorodumova, N. V. (2007) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.75.035109 · Cited by 360
Sun, H., Wang, H., & Qu, Z. (2023) · ACS Catalysis · doi:10.1021/acscatal.2c05168 · Cited by 298
Metadata
- Authors
- Jiang, Y., Adams, J. B., & van Schilfgaarde, M.
- Venue
- The Journal of Chemical Physics
- Publisher
- AIP Publishing
- Published
- 2005-08-08
- Volume
- 123
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 64701-64701
- ISSN
- 0021-9606 (ISSN-L)
- 1089-7690
- OpenAlex
- W2164365848
- Cited by
- 240
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Density-functional calculation of CeO2 surfaces and prediction of effects of oxygen partial pressure and temperature on stabilities. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1063/1.1949189
- The paper
- Jiang, Y., Adams, J. B., & van Schilfgaarde, M. (2005). Density-functional calculation of CeO2 surfaces and prediction of effects of oxygen partial pressure and temperature on stabilities. The Journal of Chemical Physics. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1949189
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.