The DOI matches its Crossref record; 22 of the 22 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Efficient methods for finding transition states in chemical reactions: Comparison of improved dimer method and partitioned rational function optimization method
Abstract
A combination of interpolation methods and local saddle-point search algorithms is probably the most efficient way of finding transition states in chemical reactions. Interpolation methods such as the growing-string method and the nudged-elastic band are able to find an approximation to the minimum-energy pathway and thereby provide a good initial guess for a transition state and imaginary mode connecting both reactant and product states. Since interpolation methods employ usually just a small number of configurations and converge slowly close to the minimum-energy pathway, local methods such as partitioned rational function optimization methods using either exact or approximate Hessians or minimum-mode-following methods such as the dimer or the Lanczos method have to be used to converge to the transition state. A modification to the original dimer method proposed by [Henkelman and Jónnson J. Chem. Phys. 111, 7010 (1999)] is presented, reducing the number of gradient calculations per cycle from six to four gradients or three gradients and one energy, and significantly improves the overall performance of the algorithm on quantum-chemical potential-energy surfaces, where forces are subject to numerical noise. A comparison is made between the dimer methods and the well-established partitioned rational function optimization methods for finding transition states after the use of interpolation methods. Results for 24 different small- to medium-sized chemical reactions covering a wide range of structural types demonstrate that the improved dimer method is an efficient alternative saddle-point search algorithm on medium-sized to large systems and is often even able to find transition states when partitioned rational function optimization methods fail to converge.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Stephens, P. J., Devlin, F. J., Chabalowski, C. F., & Frisch, M. J. (1994) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry · doi:10.1021/j100096a001 · Cited by 23,248
Density Functional Theory of Atoms and Molecules
Parr, R. G. (1980) · Horizons of Quantum Chemistry · doi:10.1007/978-94-009-9027-2_2 · Cited by 11,964
Bertsekas, D. P. (1997) · Journal of the Operational Research Society · doi:10.1038/sj.jors.2600425 · Cited by 11,726
Henkelman, G., & Jónsson, H. (2000) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.1323224 · Cited by 9,523
Fully optimized contracted Gaussian basis sets of triple zeta valence quality for atoms Li to Kr
Schäfer, A., Huber, C., & Ahlrichs, R. (1994) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.467146 · Cited by 9,169
Electronic structure calculations on workstation computers: The program system turbomole
Ahlrichs, R., Bär, M., Häser, M., Horn, H., & Kölmel, C. (1989) · Chemical Physics Letters · doi:10.1016/0009-2614(89)85118-8 · Cited by 8,433
Henkelman, G., & Jónsson, H. (1999) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.480097 · Cited by 3,481
Efficient molecular numerical integration schemes
Treutler, O., & Ahlrichs, R. (1995) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.469408 · Cited by 2,528
Frequency factors and isotope effects in solid state rate processes
Vineyard, G. H. (1957) · Journal of Physics and Chemistry of Solids · doi:10.1016/0022-3697(57)90059-8 · Cited by 2,269
An algorithm for the location of transition states
Baker, J. (1986) · Journal of Computational Chemistry · doi:10.1002/jcc.540070402 · Cited by 1,491
Cited by
Advances in molecular quantum chemistry contained in the Q-Chem 4 program package
Shao, Y., Gan, Z., Epifanovsky, E., Gilbert, A. T. B., Wormit, M., Kussmann, J., Lange, A. W., Behn, A., Deng, J., Feng, X., et al. (2015) · Molecular Physics · doi:10.1080/00268976.2014.952696 · Cited by 3,000
Self-citationDL-FIND: An Open-Source Geometry Optimizer for Atomistic Simulations
Kästner, J., Carr, J. M., Keal, T. W., Thiel, W., Wander, A., & Sherwood, P. (2009) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry A · doi:10.1021/jp9028968 · Cited by 658
Ultrastable single-atom gold catalysts with strong covalent metal-support interaction (CMSI)
Qiao, B., Liang, J.-X., Wang, A., Xu, C.-Q., Li, J., Zhang, T., & Liu, J. J. (2015) · Nano Research · doi:10.1007/s12274-015-0796-9 · Cited by 516
Machine learning for heterogeneous catalyst design and discovery
Goldsmith, B. R., Esterhuizen, J., Liu, J., Bartel, C. J., & Sutton, C. (2018) · AIChE Journal · doi:10.1002/aic.16198 · Cited by 444
First-principles design of a single-atom–alloy propane dehydrogenation catalyst
Hannagan, R. T., Giannakakis, G., Réocreux, R., Schumann, J., Finzel, J., Wang, Y., Michaelides, A., Deshlahra, P., Christopher, P., Flytzani-Stephanopoulos, M., et al. (2021) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.abg8389 · Cited by 380
Metadata
- Authors
- Heyden, A., Bell, A. T., & Keil, F. J.
- Venue
- The Journal of Chemical Physics
- Publisher
- AIP Publishing
- Published
- 2005-12-08
- Volume
- 123
- Issue
- 22
- Pages
- 224101-224101
- ISSN
- 0021-9606 (ISSN-L)
- 1089-7690
- OpenAlex
- W2108806320
- Cited by
- 1,036
- References
- 22
- FWCI
- 3.89
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Efficient methods for finding transition states in chemical reactions: Comparison of improved dimer method and partitioned rational function optimization method. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1063/1.2104507
- The paper
- Heyden, A., Bell, A. T., & Keil, F. J. (2005). Efficient methods for finding transition states in chemical reactions: Comparison of improved dimer method and partitioned rational function optimization method. The Journal of Chemical Physics. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2104507
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.