Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 313

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The correlation consistent composite approach (cc CA): An alternative to the Gaussian-n methods

Open access
DeYonker, Nathan J., Cundari, Thomas R., Wilson, Angela K.·2006·The Journal of Chemical Physics

Abstract

An alternative to the Gaussian-n (G1, G2, and G3) composite methods of computing molecular energies is proposed and is named the “correlation consistent composite approach” (ccCA, ccCA-CBS-1, ccCA-CBS-2). This approach uses the correlation consistent polarized valence (cc-pVXZ) basis sets. The G2-1 test set of 48 enthalpies of formation (ΔHf), 38 adiabatic ionization potentials (IPs), 25 adiabatic electron affinities (EAs), and 8 adiabatic proton affinities (PAs) are computed using this approach, as well as the ΔHf values of 30 more systems. Equilibrium molecular geometries and vibrational frequencies are obtained using B3LYP density functional theory. When applying the ccCA-CBS method with the cc-pVXZ series of basis sets augmented with diffuse functions, mean absolute deviations within the G2-1 test set compared to experiment are 1.33kcalmol−1 for ΔHf,0.81kcalmol−1 for IPs, 1.02kcalmol−1 for EAs, and 1.51kcalmol−1 for PAs, without including the “high-level correction” (HLC) contained in the original Gn methods. Whereas the HLC originated in the Gaussian-1 method as an isogyric correction, it evolved into a fitted parameter that minimized the error of the composite methods, eliminating its physical meaning. Recomputing the G1 and G3 enthalpies of formation without the HLC reveals a systematic trend where most ΔHf values are significantly higher than experimental values. By extrapolating electronic energies to the complete basis set (CBS) limit and adding G3-like corrections for the core-valence and infinite-order electron correlation effects, ccCA-CBS-2 often underestimates the experimental ΔHf, especially for larger systems. This is desired as inclusion of relativistic and atomic spin-orbit effects subsequently improves theoretical ΔHf values to give a 0.81kcalmol−1 mean absolute deviation with ccCA-CBS-2. The ccCA-CBS method is a viable “black box” method that can be used on systems with at least 10–15 heavy atoms.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1063/1.2173988

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 313

Metadata

Authors
DeYonker, N. J., Cundari, T. R., & Wilson, A. K.
Venue
The Journal of Chemical Physics
Published
2006-03-17
Volume
124
Issue
11
Pages
114104-114104
ISSN
  • 0021-9606 (ISSN-L)
  • 1089-7690
OpenAlex
W2037215106
Cited by
313
References
0
FWCI
11.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The correlation consistent composite approach (cc CA): An alternative to the Gaussian-n methods. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1063/1.2173988
The paper
DeYonker, N. J., Cundari, T. R., & Wilson, A. K. (2006). The correlation consistent composite approach (cc CA): An alternative to the Gaussian-n methods. The Journal of Chemical Physics. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2173988

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.