The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The correlation consistent composite approach (cc CA): An alternative to the Gaussian-n methods
Open accessAbstract
An alternative to the Gaussian-n (G1, G2, and G3) composite methods of computing molecular energies is proposed and is named the “correlation consistent composite approach” (ccCA, ccCA-CBS-1, ccCA-CBS-2). This approach uses the correlation consistent polarized valence (cc-pVXZ) basis sets. The G2-1 test set of 48 enthalpies of formation (ΔHf), 38 adiabatic ionization potentials (IPs), 25 adiabatic electron affinities (EAs), and 8 adiabatic proton affinities (PAs) are computed using this approach, as well as the ΔHf values of 30 more systems. Equilibrium molecular geometries and vibrational frequencies are obtained using B3LYP density functional theory. When applying the ccCA-CBS method with the cc-pVXZ series of basis sets augmented with diffuse functions, mean absolute deviations within the G2-1 test set compared to experiment are 1.33kcalmol−1 for ΔHf,0.81kcalmol−1 for IPs, 1.02kcalmol−1 for EAs, and 1.51kcalmol−1 for PAs, without including the “high-level correction” (HLC) contained in the original Gn methods. Whereas the HLC originated in the Gaussian-1 method as an isogyric correction, it evolved into a fitted parameter that minimized the error of the composite methods, eliminating its physical meaning. Recomputing the G1 and G3 enthalpies of formation without the HLC reveals a systematic trend where most ΔHf values are significantly higher than experimental values. By extrapolating electronic energies to the complete basis set (CBS) limit and adding G3-like corrections for the core-valence and infinite-order electron correlation effects, ccCA-CBS-2 often underestimates the experimental ΔHf, especially for larger systems. This is desired as inclusion of relativistic and atomic spin-orbit effects subsequently improves theoretical ΔHf values to give a 0.81kcalmol−1 mean absolute deviation with ccCA-CBS-2. The ccCA-CBS method is a viable “black box” method that can be used on systems with at least 10–15 heavy atoms.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Curtiss, L. A., Redfern, P. C., & Raghavachari, K. (2007) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.2436888 · Cited by 2,115
Riley, K. E., Pitoňák, M., Jurečka, P., & Hobza, P. (2010) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr1000173 · Cited by 759
Computational electrochemistry: prediction of liquid-phase reduction potentials
Marenich, A. V., Ho, J., Coote, M. L., Cramer, C. J., & Truhlar, D. G. (2014) · Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. · doi:10.1039/c4cp01572j · Cited by 508
Unrestricted Coupled Cluster and Brueckner Doubles Variations of W1 Theory
Barnes, E. C., Petersson, G. A., Montgomery, J. A., Frisch, M. J., & Martin, J. M. L. (2009) · Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation · doi:10.1021/ct900260g · Cited by 274
A computational chemist's guide to accurate thermochemistry for organic molecules
Karton, A. (2016) · WIREs Computational Molecular Science · doi:10.1002/wcms.1249 · Cited by 266
Metadata
- Authors
- DeYonker, N. J., Cundari, T. R., & Wilson, A. K.
- Venue
- The Journal of Chemical Physics
- Publisher
- AIP Publishing
- Published
- 2006-03-17
- Volume
- 124
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 114104-114104
- ISSN
- 0021-9606 (ISSN-L)
- 1089-7690
- OpenAlex
- W2037215106
- Cited by
- 313
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 11.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The correlation consistent composite approach (cc CA): An alternative to the Gaussian-n methods. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1063/1.2173988
- The paper
- DeYonker, N. J., Cundari, T. R., & Wilson, A. K. (2006). The correlation consistent composite approach (cc CA): An alternative to the Gaussian-n methods. The Journal of Chemical Physics. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2173988
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.