The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Equations of state in a lattice Boltzmann model
Abstract
In this paper we consider the incorporation of various equations of state into the single-component multiphase lattice Boltzmann model. Several cubic equations of state, including the van der Waals, Redlich-Kwong, and Peng-Robinson, as well as a noncubic equation of state (Carnahan-Starling), are incorporated into the lattice Boltzmann model. The details of phase separation in these nonideal single-component systems are presented by comparing the numerical simulation results in terms of density ratios, spurious currents, and temperature ranges. A comparison with a real fluid system, i.e., the properties of saturated water and steam, is also presented.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Lattice-Boltzmann method for complex flows
Aidun, C. K., & Clausen, J. R. (2010) · Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics · doi:10.1146/annurev-fluid-121108-145519 · Cited by 1,991
Andersson, M., Beale, S. B., Espinoza, M., Wu, Z., & Lehnert, W. (2016) · Applied Energy · doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.08.010 · Cited by 204
Metadata
- Authors
- Yuan, P., & Schaefer, L.
- Venue
- Physics of Fluids
- Publisher
- AIP Publishing
- Published
- 2006-04-01
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 4
- ISSN
- 1070-6631 (ISSN-L)
- 1089-7666
- OpenAlex
- W2033642666
- Cited by
- 1,074
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 13.89
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
