Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,599

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

A simple effective potential for exchange

Becke, Axel D., Johnson, Erin R.·2006·The Journal of Chemical Physics

Abstract

The optimized effective potential (OEP) for exchange was introduced some time ago by Sharp and Horton [Phys. Rev. 90, 317 (1953)] and by Talman and Shadwick [Phys. Rev. A 14, 36 (1976)]. The integral equation for the OEP is difficult to solve, however, and a variety of approximations have therefore been proposed. These are explicitly orbital dependent and require the same two-electron integrals as Hartree-Fock theory. We have found a remarkably simple approximate effective potential that closely resembles the Talman-Shadwick potential in atoms. It depends only on total densities and requires no two-electron integrals.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1063/1.2213970

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 1,599

Metadata

Authors
Becke, A. D., & Johnson, E. R.
Venue
The Journal of Chemical Physics
Published
2006-06-09
Volume
124
Issue
22
Pages
221101-221101
ISSN
  • 0021-9606 (ISSN-L)
  • 1089-7690
OpenAlex
W1996845210
Cited by
1,599
References
0
FWCI
3.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A simple effective potential for exchange. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1063/1.2213970
The paper
Becke, A. D., & Johnson, E. R. (2006). A simple effective potential for exchange. The Journal of Chemical Physics. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2213970

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.