Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 244

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A restricted-open-shell complete-basis-set model chemistry

Wood, Geoffrey P. F., Radom, Leo, Petersson, George A., Barnes, Ericka C., Frisch, Michael J., Montgomery, John A.·2006·The Journal of Chemical Physics

Abstract

A restricted-open-shell model chemistry based on the complete basis set-quadratic Becke3 (CBS-QB3) model is formulated and denoted ROCBS-QB3. As the name implies, this method uses spin-restricted wave functions, both for the direct calculations of the various components of the electronic energy and for extrapolating the correlation energy to the complete-basis-set limit. These modifications eliminate the need for empirical corrections that are incorporated in standard CBS-QB3 to compensate for spin contamination when spin-unrestricted wave functions are used. We employ an initial test set of 19 severely spin-contaminated species including doublet radicals and both singlet and triplet biradicals. The mean absolute deviation (MAD) from experiment for the new ROCBS-QB3 model (3.6±1.5kJmol−1) is slightly smaller than that of the standard unrestricted CBS-QB3 version (4.8±1.5kJmol−1) and substantially smaller than the MAD for the unrestricted CBS-QB3 before inclusion of the spin correction (16.1±1.5kJmol−1). However, when applied to calculate the heats of formation at 298K for the moderately spin-contaminated radicals in the G2/97 test set, ROCBS-QB3 does not perform quite as well as the standard unrestricted CBS-QB3, with a MAD from experiment of 3.8±1.6kJmol−1 (compared with 2.9±1.6kJmol−1 for standard CBS-QB3). ROCBS-QB3 performs marginally better than standard CBS-QB3 for the G2/97 set of ionization energies with a MAD of 4.1±0.1kJmol−1 (compared with 4.4±0.1kJmol−1) and electron affinities with a MAD of 3.9±0.2kJmol−1 (compared with 4.3±0.2kJmol−1), but the differences in MAD values are comparable to the experimental uncertainties. Our overall conclusion is that ROCBS-QB3 eliminates the spin correction in standard CBS-QB3 with no loss in accuracy.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1063/1.2335438

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 244

Metadata

Authors
Wood, G. P. F., Radom, L., Petersson, G. A., Barnes, E. C., Frisch, M. J., & Montgomery, J. A.
Venue
The Journal of Chemical Physics
Published
2006-09-05
Volume
125
Issue
9
Pages
094106-094106
ISSN
  • 0021-9606 (ISSN-L)
  • 1089-7690
OpenAlex
W2037641477
Cited by
244
References
1
FWCI
3.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A restricted-open-shell complete-basis-set model chemistry. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1063/1.2335438
The paper
Wood, G. P. F., Radom, L., Petersson, G. A., Barnes, E. C., Frisch, M. J., & Montgomery, J. A. (2006). A restricted-open-shell complete-basis-set model chemistry. The Journal of Chemical Physics. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2335438

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.