The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A generalization of the charge equilibration method for nonmetallic materials
Abstract
Assigning effective atomic charges that properly reproduce the electrostatic fields of molecules is a crucial step in the construction of accurate interatomic potentials. We propose a new approach to calculate these charges, which as previous approaches are, is based on the idea of charge equilibration. However, we only allow charge to flow between covalently bonded neighbors by using the concept of so-called split charges. The semiempirical fit parameters in our approach do not only reflect atomic properties (electronegativity and atomic hardness) but also bond-dependent properties. The new method contains two popular but hitherto disjunct approaches as limiting cases. We apply our methodology to a set of molecules containing the elements silicon, carbon, oxygen, and hydrogen. Effective charges derived from electrostatic potential surfaces can be predicted more than twice as accurately as with previous works, at the expense of one additional fit parameter per bond type controlling the polarizability between two bonded atoms. Additional bond-type parameters can be introduced, but barely improve the results. An increase in accuracy of only 30% over existing techniques is achieved when predicting Mulliken charges. However, this could be improved with additional bond-type parameters.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The ReaxFF reactive force-field: development, applications and future directions
Senftle, T. P., Hong, S., Islam, M. M., Kylasa, S. B., Zheng, Y., Shin, Y. K., Junkermeier, C., Engel-Herbert, R., Janik, M. J., Aktulga, H. M., et al. (2016) · npj Computational Materials · doi:10.1038/npjcompumats.2015.11 · Cited by 2,363
Four Generations of High-Dimensional Neural Network Potentials
Behler, J. (2021) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c00868 · Cited by 873
Classical Electrostatics for Biomolecular Simulations
Cisneros, G. A., Karttunen, M., Ren, P., & Sagui, C. (2014) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr300461d · Cited by 259
Metadata
- Authors
- Nistor, R. A., Polihronov, J. G., Müser, M. H., & Mosey, N. J.
- Venue
- The Journal of Chemical Physics
- Publisher
- AIP Publishing
- Published
- 2006-09-07
- Volume
- 125
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 094108-094108
- ISSN
- 0021-9606 (ISSN-L)
- 1089-7690
- OpenAlex
- W1984845825
- Cited by
- 164
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A generalization of the charge equilibration method for nonmetallic materials. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1063/1.2346671
- The paper
- Nistor, R. A., Polihronov, J. G., Müser, M. H., & Mosey, N. J. (2006). A generalization of the charge equilibration method for nonmetallic materials. The Journal of Chemical Physics. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2346671
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.