The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Automatic discovery of metastable states for the construction of Markov models of macromolecular conformational dynamics
Abstract
To meet the challenge of modeling the conformational dynamics of biological macromolecules over long time scales, much recent effort has been devoted to constructing stochastic kinetic models, often in the form of discrete-state Markov models, from short molecular dynamics simulations. To construct useful models that faithfully represent dynamics at the time scales of interest, it is necessary to decompose configuration space into a set of kinetically metastable states. Previous attempts to define these states have relied upon either prior knowledge of the slow degrees of freedom or on the application of conformational clustering techniques which assume that conformationally distinct clusters are also kinetically distinct. Here, we present a first version of an automatic algorithm for the discovery of kinetically metastable states that is generally applicable to solvated macromolecules. Given molecular dynamics trajectories initiated from a well-defined starting distribution, the algorithm discovers long lived, kinetically metastable states through successive iterations of partitioning and aggregating conformation space into kinetically related regions. The authors apply this method to three peptides in explicit solvent—terminally blocked alanine, the 21-residue helical Fs peptide, and the engineered 12-residue β-hairpin trpzip2—to assess its ability to generate physically meaningful states and faithful kinetic models.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Elements of Statistical Learning
Hastie, T., Friedman, J., & Tibshirani, R. (2001) · Springer Series in Statistics · doi:10.1007/978-0-387-21606-5 · Cited by 24,162
Protein folding and misfolding
Dobson, C. M. (2003) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature02261 · Cited by 4,791
Current Status of Transition-State Theory
Truhlar, D. G., Garrett, B. C., & Klippenstein, S. J. (1996) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jp953748q · Cited by 2,279
Protein states and proteinquakes.
Ansari, A., Berendzen, J., Bowne, S. F., Frauenfelder, H., Iben, I. E., Sauke, T. B., Shyamsunder, E., & Young, R. D. (1985) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.82.15.5000 · Cited by 828
Reaction coordinates of biomolecular isomerization
Bolhuis, P. G., Dellago, C., & Chandler, D. (2000) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.100127697 · Cited by 426
Automatic Method for Identifying Reaction Coordinates in Complex Systems
Ma, A., & Dinner, A. R. (2005) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry B · doi:10.1021/jp045546c · Cited by 400
Cited by
Markov models of molecular kinetics: Generation and validation
Prinz, J.-H., Wu, H., Sarich, M., Keller, B., Senne, M., Held, M., Chodera, J. D., Schütte, C., & Noé, F. (2011) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.3565032 · Cited by 1,275
Self-citationDill, K. A., Ozkan, S. B., Shell, M. S., & Weikl, T. R. (2008) · Annual Review of Biophysics · doi:10.1146/annurev.biophys.37.092707.153558 · Cited by 1,163
Self-citationPyEMMA 2: A Software Package for Estimation, Validation, and Analysis of Markov Models
Scherer, M. K., Trendelkamp-Schroer, B., Paul, F., Pérez-Hernández, G., Hoffmann, M., Plattner, N., Wehmeyer, C., Prinz, J.-H., & Noé, F. (2015) · Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation · doi:10.1021/acs.jctc.5b00743 · Cited by 1,163
Identification of slow molecular order parameters for Markov model construction
Pérez-Hernández, G., Paul, F., Giorgino, T., De Fabritiis, G., & Noé, F. (2013) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.4811489 · Cited by 990
“The resulting models are often called transition networks [74, 62, 32], Diffusion maps [18, 76], Master equation models [87, 14], Markov models [64] or Markov state models [86, 16] (MSM), where “Markovianity” means that the kinetics are modeled by a memoryless jump process between states.”
BackgroundMachine Learning for Molecular Simulation
Noé, F., Tkatchenko, A., Müller, K.-R., & Clementi, C. (2020) · Annual Review of Physical Chemistry · doi:10.1146/annurev-physchem-042018-052331 · Cited by 956
Metadata
- Authors
- Chodera, J. D., Singhal, N., Pande, V. S., Dill, K. A., & Swope, W. C.
- Venue
- The Journal of Chemical Physics
- Publisher
- AIP Publishing
- Published
- 2007-04-19
- Volume
- 126
- Issue
- 15
- Pages
- 155101-155101
- ISSN
- 0021-9606 (ISSN-L)
- 1089-7690
- OpenAlex
- W2091707670
- Cited by
- 640
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 13.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Automatic discovery of metastable states for the construction of Markov models of macromolecular conformational dynamics. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1063/1.2714538
- The paper
- Chodera, J. D., Singhal, N., Pande, V. S., Dill, K. A., & Swope, W. C. (2007). Automatic discovery of metastable states for the construction of Markov models of macromolecular conformational dynamics. The Journal of Chemical Physics. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2714538
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.