Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 301

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Assessment of the efficiency of long-range corrected functionals for some properties of large compounds

Jacquemin, Denis, Perpète, Eric A., Scalmani, Giovanni, Frisch, Michael J., Kobayashi, Rika, Adamo, Carlo·2007·The Journal of Chemical Physics

Abstract

Using the long-range correction (LC) density functional theory (DFT) scheme introduced by Iikura et al. [J. Chem. Phys. 115, 3540 (2001)] and the Coulomb-attenuating model (CAM-B3LYP) of Yanai et al. [Chem. Phys. Lett. 393, 51 (2004)], we have calculated a series of properties that are known to be poorly reproduced by standard functionals: Bond length alternation of π-conjugated polymers, polarizabilities of delocalized chains, and electronic spectra of extended dyes. For each of these properties, we present cases in which traditional hybrid functionals do provide accurate results and cases in which they fail to reproduce the correct trends. The quality of the results is assessed with regard to experimental values and/or data arising from electron-correlated wave function approaches. It turns out that (i) both LC-DFT and CAM-B3LYP provide an accurate bond length alternation for polyacetylene and polymethineimine, although for the latter they decrease slightly too rapidly with chain length. (ii) The LC generalized gradient approximation and MP2 polarizabilities of long polyphosphazene and polymethineimine oligomers agree almost perfectly. In the same way, CAM-B3LYP corrects the major part of the B3LYP faults. (iii) LC and CAM techniques do not help in correcting the nonrealistic evolution with chain length of the absorption wavelengths of cyanine derivatives. In addition, though both schemes significantly overestimate the ground to excited state transition energy of substituted anthraquinone dyes, they provide a more consistent picture once a statistical treatment is performed than do traditional hybrid functionals.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1063/1.2715573

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 301

Metadata

Authors
Jacquemin, D., Perpète, E. A., Scalmani, G., Frisch, M. J., Kobayashi, R., & Adamo, C.
Venue
The Journal of Chemical Physics
Published
2007-04-11
Volume
126
Issue
14
Pages
144105-144105
ISSN
  • 0021-9606 (ISSN-L)
  • 1089-7690
OpenAlex
W2048821415
Cited by
301
References
2
FWCI
13.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Assessment of the efficiency of long-range corrected functionals for some properties of large compounds. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1063/1.2715573
The paper
Jacquemin, D., Perpète, E. A., Scalmani, G., Frisch, M. J., Kobayashi, R., & Adamo, C. (2007). Assessment of the efficiency of long-range corrected functionals for some properties of large compounds. The Journal of Chemical Physics. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2715573

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.