The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A microscopic model for the behavior of nanostructured organic photovoltaic devices
Open accessAbstract
We present a Monte Carlo model of carrier separation and recombination in nanostructured organic photovoltaic (OPV) devices which takes into account all electrostatic interactions, energetic disorder, and polaronic effects. This permits a detailed analysis of the strong morphology dependence of carrier collection efficiency. We find that performance is determined both by the orientation of the heterojunction relative to the external electric field as well as by carrier confinement due to polymer intermixing. The model predicts that an idealized interdigitated structure could achieve overall efficiencies twice as high as blends. The model also reproduces the weakly sublinear intensity dependence of short-circuit photocurrent (ISC) seen in experiment. We show that this is not the result of space-charge effects but of bimolecular recombination. Disconnected islands of polymer in coarser blends result in bimolecular recombination even at low intensities and should therefore be minimized. By including a microscopic description of dark injection, the model can describe the full current-voltage (J-V) characteristics of different OPV structures. We examine the effect of morphology, intensity, mobility, and recombination rate on key parameters such as short-circuit current, open-circuit voltage (VOC), and fill factor (FF). The model reproduces the intensity-dependent contribution to VOC in a bilayer above that of a blend observed in experiment. We find that performance in both bilayers and blends is very sensitive to the recombination rate across the heterojunction. The model also predicts a striking dependence of performance on mobility. Indeed it is shown that a tenfold increase in mobility dramatically improves ISC and FF and doubles the maximum power output in a bilayer device. As well as informing routes for improving device performance, the model also offers an improved microscopic understanding of OPV operation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Electron transfer reactions in chemistry. Theory and experiment
Marcus, R. A. (1993) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.65.599 · Cited by 3,667
Cited by
Charge Photogeneration in Organic Solar Cells
Clarke, T. M., & Durrant, J. R. (2010) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr900271s · Cited by 2,372
Interpretable deep learning for guided microstructure-property explorations in photovoltaics
Pokuri, B. S. S., Ghosal, S., Kokate, A., Sarkar, S., & Ganapathysubramanian, B. (2019) · npj Computational Materials · doi:10.1038/s41524-019-0231-y · Cited by 73
Metadata
- Authors
- Marsh, R. A., Groves, C., & Greenham, N. C.
- Venue
- Journal of Applied Physics
- Publisher
- AIP Publishing
- Published
- 2007-04-15
- Volume
- 101
- Issue
- 8
- ISSN
- 0021-8979 (ISSN-L)
- 1089-7550
- OpenAlex
- W2041363197
- Cited by
- 231
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 21.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A microscopic model for the behavior of nanostructured organic photovoltaic devices. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1063/1.2718865
- The paper
- Marsh, R. A., Groves, C., & Greenham, N. C. (2007). A microscopic model for the behavior of nanostructured organic photovoltaic devices. Journal of Applied Physics. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2718865
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.