The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Coupling term derivation and general implementation of state-specific multireference coupled cluster theories
Abstract
Simple closed-form expressions are derived for the “same vacuum” renormalization terms that arise in state-specific multireference coupled cluster (MRCC) theories. Explicit equations are provided for these coupling terms through the triple excitation level of MRCC theory, and a general expression is included for arbitrary-order excitations. The first production-level code (PSIMRCC) for state-specific and rigorously size-extensive Mukherjee multireference coupled cluster singles and doubles (MkCCSD) computations has been written. This code is also capable of evaluating analogous Brillouin-Wigner multireference energies (BWCCSD), including a posteriori size-extensivity corrections. Using correlation-consistent basis sets (cc-pVXZ, X=D,T,Q), MkCCSD and BWCCSD were tested and compared on two classic multireference problems: (1) the dissociation potential curve of molecular fluorine (F2) and (2) the structure and vibrational frequencies of ozone. Comparison with experimental data shows that the Mukherjee method is generally superior to the Brillouin-Wigner theory in predicting energies, structures, and vibrational frequencies. Particularly accurate results for F2 are obtained by applying the MkCCSD method with localized molecular orbitals. Although the MkCCSD theory greatly improves upon single-reference CCSD for the geometric parameters and a1 vibrational frequencies of ozone, the antisymmetric stretching frequency ω3(b2) remains pathological and cannot be properly treated without the inclusion of connected triple excitations. Finally, preliminary multireference MkCCSD results are reported for the singlet-triplet splittings in ortho-, meta-, and para-benzyne, coming within 1.5kcalmol−1 of experiment in all cases.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Kowalski, K., & Piecuch, P. (2000) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.481769 · Cited by 440
PSI3: An open‐source Ab Initio electronic structure package
Crawford, T. D., Sherrill, C. D., Valeev, E. F., Fermann, J. T., King, R. A., Leininger, M. L., Brown, S. T., Janssen, C. L., Seidl, E. T., Kenny, J. P., et al. (2007) · Journal of Computational Chemistry · doi:10.1002/jcc.20573 · Cited by 271
Self-citation
Cited by
Psi4: an open‐source ab initio electronic structure program
Turney, J. M., Simmonett, A. C., Parrish, R. M., Hohenstein, E. G., Evangelista, F. A., Fermann, J. T., Mintz, B. J., Burns, L. A., Wilke, J. J., Abrams, M. L., et al. (2012) · WIREs Computational Molecular Science · doi:10.1002/wcms.93 · Cited by 1,083
Self-citationEvangelista, F. A. (2011) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.3598471 · Cited by 135
Self-citationIs cyclobutadiene really highly destabilized by antiaromaticity?
Wu, J. I.-C., Mo, Y., Evangelista, F. A., & von Ragué Schleyer, P. (2012) · Chemical Communications · doi:10.1039/c2cc33521b · Cited by 85
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Evangelista, F. A., Allen, W. D., & Schaefer, H. F.
- Venue
- The Journal of Chemical Physics
- Publisher
- AIP Publishing
- Published
- 2007-07-10
- Volume
- 127
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 024102-024102
- ISSN
- 0021-9606 (ISSN-L)
- 1089-7690
- OpenAlex
- W1990863438
- Cited by
- 272
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 17.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Coupling term derivation and general implementation of state-specific multireference coupled cluster theories. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1063/1.2743014
- The paper
- Evangelista, F. A., Allen, W. D., & Schaefer, H. F. (2007). Coupling term derivation and general implementation of state-specific multireference coupled cluster theories. The Journal of Chemical Physics. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2743014
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.