The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Excitation energies in density functional theory: An evaluation and a diagnostic test
Open accessAbstract
Electronic excitation energies are determined using the CAM-B3LYP Coulomb-attenuated functional [T. Yanai et al. Chem. Phys. Lett. 393, 51 (2004)], together with a standard generalized gradient approximation (GGA) and hybrid functional. The degree of spatial overlap between the occupied and virtual orbitals involved in an excitation is measured using a quantity Λ, and the extent to which excitation energy errors correlate with Λ is quantified. For a set of 59 excitations of local, Rydberg, and intramolecular charge-transfer character in 18 theoretically challenging main-group molecules, CAM-B3LYP provides by far the best overall performance; no correlation is observed between excitation energy errors and Λ, reflecting the good quality, balanced description of all three categories of excitation. By contrast, a clear correlation is observed for the GGA and, to a lesser extent, the hybrid functional, allowing a simple diagnostic test to be proposed for judging the reliability of a general excitation from these functionals—when Λ falls below a prescribed threshold, excitations are likely to be in very significant error. The study highlights the ambiguous nature of the term “charge transfer,” providing insight into the observation that while many charge-transfer excitations are poorly described by GGA and hybrid functionals, others are accurately reproduced.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Generalized Gradient Approximation Made Simple
Perdew, J. P., Burke, K., & Ernzerhof, M. (1996) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.77.3865 · Cited by 215,824
Density-functional thermochemistry. III. The role of exact exchange
Becke, A. D. (1993) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.464913 · Cited by 103,767
Lee, C., Yang, W., & Parr, R. G. (1988) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.37.785 · Cited by 100,874
Density-Functional Theory for Time-Dependent Systems
Runge, E., & Gross, E. K. U. (1984) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.52.997 · Cited by 8,914
Cited by
Laurent, A. D., & Jacquemin, D. (2013) · International Journal of Quantum Chemistry · doi:10.1002/qua.24438 · Cited by 1,382
Improta, R., Santoro, F., & Blancafort, L. (2016) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00444 · Cited by 499
Chen, X., Xu, C., Wang, T., Zhou, C., Du, J., Wang, Z., Xu, H., Xie, T., Bi, G., Jiang, J., et al. (2016) · Angewandte Chemie International Edition · doi:10.1002/anie.201601252 · Cited by 445
Progress and Challenges in the Calculation of Electronic Excited States
González, L., Escudero, D., & Serrano‐Andrés, L. (2012) · ChemPhysChem · doi:10.1002/cphc.201100200 · Cited by 429
Dye chemistry with time-dependent density functional theory
Laurent, A. D., Adamo, C., & Jacquemin, D. (2014) · Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. · doi:10.1039/c3cp55336a · Cited by 398
Metadata
- Authors
- Peach, M. J. G., Benfield, P., Helgaker, T., & Tozer, D. J.
- Venue
- The Journal of Chemical Physics
- Publisher
- AIP Publishing
- Published
- 2008-01-28
- Volume
- 128
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 044118-044118
- ISSN
- 0021-9606 (ISSN-L)
- 1089-7690
- OpenAlex
- W2062917591
- Cited by
- 1,401
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 43.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Excitation energies in density functional theory: An evaluation and a diagnostic test. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1063/1.2831900
- The paper
- Peach, M. J. G., Benfield, P., Helgaker, T., & Tozer, D. J. (2008). Excitation energies in density functional theory: An evaluation and a diagnostic test. The Journal of Chemical Physics. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2831900
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.