The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Optimization methods for finding minimum energy paths
Abstract
A comparison of chain-of-states based methods for finding minimum energy pathways (MEPs) is presented. In each method, a set of images along an initial pathway between two local minima is relaxed to find a MEP. We compare the nudged elastic band (NEB), doubly nudged elastic band, string, and simplified string methods, each with a set of commonly used optimizers. Our results show that the NEB and string methods are essentially equivalent and the most efficient methods for finding MEPs when coupled with a suitable optimizer. The most efficient optimizer was found to be a form of the limited-memory Broyden-Fletcher-Goldfarb-Shanno method in which the approximate inverse Hessian is constructed globally for all images along the path. The use of a climbing-image allows for finding the saddle point while representing the MEP with as few images as possible. If a highly accurate MEP is desired, it is found to be more efficient to descend from the saddle to the minima than to use a chain-of-states method with many images. Our results are based on a pairwise Morse potential to model rearrangements of a heptamer island on Pt(111), and plane-wave based density functional theory to model a rollover diffusion mechanism of a Pd tetramer on MgO(100) and dissociative adsorption and diffusion of oxygen on Au(111).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
From ultrasoft pseudopotentials to the projector augmented-wave method
Kresse, G., & Joubert, D. (1999) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.59.1758 · Cited by 85,307
Special points for Brillouin-zone integrations
Monkhorst, H. J., & Pack, J. D. (1976) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.13.5188 · Cited by 71,721
Cited by
Design of electrocatalysts for oxygen- and hydrogen-involving energy conversion reactions
Jiao, Y., Zheng, Y., Jaroniec, M., & Qiao, S. Z. (2015) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c4cs00470a · Cited by 5,388
QuantumATK: an integrated platform of electronic and atomic-scale modelling tools
Smidstrup, S., Markussen, T., Vancraeyveld, P., Wellendorff, J., Schneider, J., Gunst, T., Verstichel, B., Stradi, D., Khomyakov, P. A., Vej-Hansen, U. G., et al. (2020) · Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter · doi:10.1088/1361-648x/ab4007 · Cited by 1,920
Combining Machine Learning and Computational Chemistry for Predictive Insights Into Chemical Systems
Keith, J. A., Vassilev-Galindo, V., Cheng, B., Chmiela, S., Gastegger, M., Müller, K.-R., & Tkatchenko, A. (2021) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.1c00107 · Cited by 849
Materials Design Rules for Multivalent Ion Mobility in Intercalation Structures
Rong, Z., Malik, R., Canepa, P., Sai Gautam, G., Liu, M., Jain, A., Persson, K., & Ceder, G. (2015) · Chemistry of Materials · doi:10.1021/acs.chemmater.5b02342 · Cited by 561
Zhu, S., Qin, X., Xiao, F., Yang, S., Xu, Y., Tan, Z., Li, J., Yan, J., Chen, Q., Chen, M., et al. (2021) · Nature Catalysis · doi:10.1038/s41929-021-00663-5 · Cited by 436
Metadata
- Authors
- Sheppard, D., Terrell, R., & Henkelman, G.
- Venue
- The Journal of Chemical Physics
- Publisher
- AIP Publishing
- Published
- 2008-04-02
- Volume
- 128
- Issue
- 13
- Pages
- 134106-134106
- ISSN
- 0021-9606 (ISSN-L)
- 1089-7690
- OpenAlex
- W2065251521
- Cited by
- 1,859
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 24.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Optimization methods for finding minimum energy paths. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1063/1.2841941
- The paper
- Sheppard, D., Terrell, R., & Henkelman, G. (2008). Optimization methods for finding minimum energy paths. The Journal of Chemical Physics. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2841941
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.