The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Benchmarks for electronically excited states: CASPT2, CC2, CCSD, and CC3
Abstract
A benchmark set of 28 medium-sized organic molecules is assembled that covers the most important classes of chromophores including polyenes and other unsaturated aliphatic compounds, aromatic hydrocarbons, heterocycles, carbonyl compounds, and nucleobases. Vertical excitation energies and one-electron properties are computed for the valence excited states of these molecules using both multiconfigurational second-order perturbation theory, CASPT2, and a hierarchy of coupled cluster methods, CC2, CCSD, and CC3. The calculations are done at identical geometries (MP2∕6-31G*) and with the same basis set (TZVP). In most cases, the CC3 results are very close to the CASPT2 results, whereas there are larger deviations with CC2 and CCSD, especially in singlet excited states that are not dominated by single excitations. Statistical evaluations of the calculated vertical excitation energies for 223 states are presented and discussed in order to assess the relative merits of the applied methods. CC2 reproduces the CC3 reference data for the singlets better than CCSD. On the basis of the current computational results and an extensive survey of the literature, we propose best estimates for the energies of 104 singlet and 63 triplet excited states.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Laurent, A. D., & Jacquemin, D. (2013) · International Journal of Quantum Chemistry · doi:10.1002/qua.24438 · Cited by 1,382
Improta, R., Santoro, F., & Blancafort, L. (2016) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00444 · Cited by 499
Progress and Challenges in the Calculation of Electronic Excited States
González, L., Escudero, D., & Serrano‐Andrés, L. (2012) · ChemPhysChem · doi:10.1002/cphc.201100200 · Cited by 429
Singlet fission in pentacene through multi-exciton quantum states
Zimmerman, P. M., Zhang, Z., & Musgrave, C. B. (2010) · Nature Chemistry · doi:10.1038/nchem.694 · Cited by 406
Dye chemistry with time-dependent density functional theory
Laurent, A. D., Adamo, C., & Jacquemin, D. (2014) · Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. · doi:10.1039/c3cp55336a · Cited by 398
Metadata
- Authors
- Schreiber, M., Silva-Junior, M. R., Sauer, S. P. A., & Thiel, W.
- Venue
- The Journal of Chemical Physics
- Publisher
- AIP Publishing
- Published
- 2008-04-07
- Volume
- 128
- Issue
- 13
- Pages
- 134110-134110
- ISSN
- 0021-9606 (ISSN-L)
- 1089-7690
- OpenAlex
- W2036860653
- Cited by
- 977
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 27.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Benchmarks for electronically excited states: CASPT2, CC2, CCSD, and CC3. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1063/1.2889385
- The paper
- Schreiber, M., Silva-Junior, M. R., Sauer, S. P. A., & Thiel, W. (2008). Benchmarks for electronically excited states: CASPT2, CC2, CCSD, and CC3. The Journal of Chemical Physics. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2889385
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.