Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 3,638

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The Nuclear Many-Body Problem

Ring, P., Schuck, P., Strayer, M. R.·1983·Physics Today

Abstract

The liquid drop model the shell model rotation and single-particle motion nuclear forces the Hartree-Fock method pairing correlations and superfluid nuclei the generalized single-particle model (HFB theory) harmonic vibrations boson expansion methods the generator coordinate method restoration of broken symmetries the time dependent Hartree-Fock method (TDHF) semiclassical methods in nuclear physics. Appendices: angular momentum algebra in the laboratory and the body-fixed system electromagnetic moments and transitions second quantization density matrices theorems concerning product wave functions many-body green's functions.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1063/1.2915762

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 3,638

Metadata

Authors
Ring, P., Schuck, P., & Strayer, M. R.
Venue
Physics Today
Published
1983-07-01
Volume
36
Issue
7
Pages
70-70
ISSN
  • 0031-9228 (ISSN-L)
  • 1945-0699
OpenAlex
W1976402897
Cited by
3,638
References
0
FWCI
45.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Nuclear Many-Body Problem. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1063/1.2915762
The paper
Ring, P., Schuck, P., & Strayer, M. R. (1983). The Nuclear Many-Body Problem. Physics Today. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2915762

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.