The DOI matches its Crossref record; 48 of the 48 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Rotationally invariant ab initio evaluation of Coulomb and exchange parameters for DFT+U calculations
Abstract
Conventional density functional theory (DFT) fails for strongly correlated electron systems due to large intra-atomic self-interaction errors. The DFT+U method provides a means of overcoming these errors through the use of a parametrized potential that employs an exact treatment of quantum mechanical exchange interactions. The parameters that enter into this potential correspond to the spherically averaged intra-atomic Coulomb (U) and exchange (J) interactions. Recently, we developed an ab initio approach for evaluating these parameters on the basis of unrestricted Hartree–Fock (UHF) theory, which has the advantage of being free of self-interaction errors and does not require experimental input [Mosey and Carter, Phys. Rev. B 76, 155123 (2007)]. In this work, we build on that method to develop a more robust and convenient ab initio approach for evaluating U and J. The new technique employs a relationship between U and J and the Coulomb and exchange integrals evaluated using the entire set of UHF molecular orbitals (MOs) for the system. Employing the entire set of UHF MOs renders the method rotationally invariant and eliminates the difficulty in selecting unambiguously the MOs that correspond to localized states. These aspects overcome two significant deficiencies of our earlier method. The new technique is used to evaluate U and J for Cr2O3, FeO, and Fe2O3. The resulting values of U-J are close to empirical estimates of this quantity for each of these materials and are also similar to results of constrained DFT calculations. DFT+U calculations using the ab initio parameters yield results that are in good agreement with experiment. As such, this method offers a means of performing accurate and fully predictive DFT+U calculations of strongly correlated electron materials.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Generalized Gradient Approximation Made Simple
Perdew, J. P., Burke, K., & Ernzerhof, M. (1996) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.77.3865 · Cited by 215,824
Projector augmented-wave method
Blöchl, P. E. (1994) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.50.17953 · Cited by 92,732
From ultrasoft pseudopotentials to the projector augmented-wave method
Kresse, G., & Joubert, D. (1999) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.59.1758 · Cited by 85,307
Kresse, G., & Furthmüller, J. (1996) · Computational Materials Science · doi:10.1016/0927-0256(96)00008-0 · Cited by 75,638
Shannon, R. D. (1976) · Acta Crystallographica Section A · doi:10.1107/s0567739476001551 · Cited by 66,145
Self-Consistent Equations Including Exchange and Correlation Effects
Kohn, W., & Sham, L. J. (1965) · Physical Review · doi:10.1103/physrev.140.a1133 · Cited by 64,135
Hohenberg, P., & Kohn, W. (1964) · Physical Review · doi:10.1103/physrev.136.b864 · Cited by 53,541
Ab initio molecular dynamics for liquid metals
Kresse, G., & Hafner, J. (1993) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.47.558 · Cited by 45,727
Dunning, T. H. (1989) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.456153 · Cited by 31,648
Self-interaction correction to density-functional approximations for many-electron systems
Perdew, J. P., & Zunger, A. (1981) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.23.5048 · Cited by 20,887
Cited by
Density functional theory for transition metals and transition metal chemistry
Cramer, C. J., & Truhlar, D. G. (2009) · Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics · doi:10.1039/b907148b · Cited by 1,648
Theoretical Insights into Heterogeneous (Photo)electrochemical CO2Reduction
Xu, S., & Carter, E. A. (2019) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00481 · Cited by 652
Self-citationStrong anisotropy and magnetostriction in the two-dimensional Stoner ferromagnetFe3GeTe2
Zhuang, H. L., Kent, P. R. C., & Hennig, R. G. (2016) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.93.134407 · Cited by 432
Hubbard U parameters for transition metals from first principles
Tesch, R., & Kowalski, P. M. (2022) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.105.195153 · Cited by 158
Metadata
- Authors
- Mosey, N. J., Liao, P., & Carter, E. A.
- Venue
- The Journal of Chemical Physics
- Publisher
- AIP Publishing
- Published
- 2008-07-02
- Volume
- 129
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 014103-014103
- ISSN
- 0021-9606 (ISSN-L)
- 1089-7690
- OpenAlex
- W2083197600
- Cited by
- 353
- References
- 48
- FWCI
- 4.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Rotationally invariant ab initio evaluation of Coulomb and exchange parameters for DFT+U calculations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1063/1.2943142
- The paper
- Mosey, N. J., Liao, P., & Carter, E. A. (2008). Rotationally invariant ab initio evaluation of Coulomb and exchange parameters for DFT+U calculations. The Journal of Chemical Physics. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2943142
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.