The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Simultaneous benchmarking of ground- and excited-state properties with long-range-corrected density functional theory
Abstract
We present benchmark calculations using several long-range-corrected (LRC) density functionals, in which Hartree–Fock exchange is incorporated asymptotically using a range-separated Coulomb operator, while local exchange is attenuated using an ansatz introduced by Iikura et al. [J. Chem. Phys. 115, 3540 (2001)]. We calculate ground-state atomization energies, reaction barriers, ionization energies, and electron affinities, each as a function of the range-separation parameter μ. In addition, we calculate excitation energies of small- and medium-sized molecules, again as a function of μ, by applying the LRC to time-dependent density functional theory. Representative examples of both pure and hybrid density functionals are tested. On the basis of these results, there does not appear to be a single range-separation parameter that is reasonable for both ground-state properties and vertical excitation energies. Reasonable errors in atomization energies and barrier heights are achieved only at the expense of excessively high excitation energies, at least for the medium-sized molecules, whereas values of μ that afford reasonable excitation energies yield some of the largest errors for ground-state atomization energies and barrier heights in small molecules. Notably, this conclusion is obscured if the database of excitation energies includes only small molecules, as has been the case in previous benchmark studies of LRC functionals.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Lee, C., Yang, W., & Parr, R. G. (1988) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.37.785 · Cited by 100,874
Cited by
Laurent, A. D., & Jacquemin, D. (2013) · International Journal of Quantum Chemistry · doi:10.1002/qua.24438 · Cited by 1,382
Mardirossian, N., & Head-Gordon, M. (2014) · Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics · doi:10.1039/c3cp54374a · Cited by 986
Influence of Triplet Instabilities in TDDFT
Peach, M. J. G., Williamson, M. J., & Tozer, D. J. (2011) · Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation · doi:10.1021/ct200651r · Cited by 384
Metadata
- Authors
- Rohrdanz, M. A., & Herbert, J. M.
- Venue
- The Journal of Chemical Physics
- Publisher
- AIP Publishing
- Published
- 2008-07-21
- Volume
- 129
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 034107-034107
- ISSN
- 0021-9606 (ISSN-L)
- 1089-7690
- OpenAlex
- W2079101324
- Cited by
- 343
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 13.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Simultaneous benchmarking of ground- and excited-state properties with long-range-corrected density functional theory. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1063/1.2954017
- The paper
- Rohrdanz, M. A., & Herbert, J. M. (2008). Simultaneous benchmarking of ground- and excited-state properties with long-range-corrected density functional theory. The Journal of Chemical Physics. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2954017
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.