The DOI matches its Crossref record.
On the accuracy of density-functional theory exchange-correlation functionals for H bonds in small water clusters. II. The water hexamer and van der Waals interactions
Open accessAbstract
Second order Møller–Plesset perturbation theory at the complete basis set limit and diffusion quantum Monte Carlo are used to examine several low energy isomers of the water hexamer. Both approaches predict the so-called prism to be the lowest energy isomer, followed by cage, book, and cyclic isomers. The energies of the four isomers are very similar, all being within 10–15 meV/H2O. These reference data are then used to evaluate the performance of several density-functional theory exchange-correlation (xc) functionals. A subset of the xc functionals tested for smaller water clusters [I. Santra et al., J. Chem. Phys. 127, 184104 (2007)] has been considered. While certain functionals do a reasonable job at predicting the absolute dissociation energies of the various isomers (coming within 10–20 meV/H2O), none predict the correct energetic ordering of the four isomers nor does any predict the correct low total energy isomer. All xc functionals tested either predict the book or cyclic isomers to have the largest dissociation energies. A many-body decomposition of the total interaction energies within the hexamers leads to the conclusion that the failure lies in the poor description of van der Waals (dispersion) forces in the xc functionals considered. It is shown that the addition of an empirical pairwise (attractive) C6R−6 correction to certain functionals allows for an improved energetic ordering of the hexamers. The relevance of these results to density-functional simulations of liquid water is also briefly discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Van der Waals density functionals applied to solids
Klimeš, J., Bowler, D. R., & Michaelides, A. (2011) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.83.195131 · Cited by 4,624
Self-citationChemical accuracy for the van der Waals density functional
Klimeš, J., Bowler, D. R., & Michaelides, A. (2010) · Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter · doi:10.1088/0953-8984/22/2/022201 · Cited by 3,587
Self-citationSun, J., Remsing, R. C., Zhang, Y., Sun, Z., Ruzsinszky, A., Peng, H., Yang, Z., Paul, A., Waghmare, U., Wu, X., et al. (2016) · Nature Chemistry · doi:10.1038/nchem.2535 · Cited by 960
Hermann, J., DiStasio, R. A., & Tkatchenko, A. (2017) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00446 · Cited by 657
Self-citationContinuum variational and diffusion quantum Monte Carlo calculations
Needs, R. J., Towler, M. D., Drummond, N. D., & López Ríos, P. (2010) · Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter · doi:10.1088/0953-8984/22/2/023201 · Cited by 403
Metadata
- Authors
- Santra, B., Michaelides, A., Fuchs, M., Tkatchenko, A., Filippi, C., & Scheffler, M.
- Venue
- The Journal of Chemical Physics
- Publisher
- AIP Publishing
- Published
- 2008-11-20
- Volume
- 129
- Issue
- 19
- Pages
- 194111-194111
- ISSN
- 0021-9606 (ISSN-L)
- 1089-7690
- OpenAlex
- W1986556247
- Cited by
- 242
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 12.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: On the accuracy of density-functional theory exchange-correlation functionals for H bonds in small water clusters. II. The water hexamer and van der Waals interactions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1063/1.3012573
- The paper
- Santra, B., Michaelides, A., Fuchs, M., Tkatchenko, A., Filippi, C., & Scheffler, M. (2008). On the accuracy of density-functional theory exchange-correlation functionals for H bonds in small water clusters. II. The water hexamer and van der Waals interactions. The Journal of Chemical Physics. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3012573
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.