The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Two Cultures and the Scientific Revolution
Abstract
Revolution. The 1959 Rede Lecture. By C. P. Snow. Price, $1.75. Pp. 58, with notes. Cambridge University Press, 32 E. 57th St., New York, 1960. Also available in paperback edition, price, $1.25. Last year's Rede Lecture at Cambridge C. P. Snow is now available in a slim, thoughtful, and disturbing volume entitled The Two Cultures and The Scientific Revolution. It runs a mere 58 pages of direct, insistent, pellucid prose and can be read in one hour. Since it takes so little time to courageously tackle problems vital to scientists, and since it is modestly priced, this unimposing book may well be the greatest literary bargain of an inflated publishing age. The two cultures in the title are the modern culture of the scientific intellectual and the traditional culture of the literary intellectual. With a foot in each cultural camp, C. P. Snow comes uniquely armed to the fray. He states his own qualifications : by training was a scientist; vocation was a writer. More specifically, Charles Percy Snow, the scientist, won his M. A. in physics in 1928, after taking first honors in chemistry at Leicester University. He then became a research fellow at Christ College, Cambridge. During the war, he was charged with the proper placement of English scien¬ tists the Ministry of Labor. For the last thirteen years, he has directed English Electric, Britain's largest electrical firm. On the literary side of the ledger, C. P. Snow is the famous author of a projected cycle of eleven novels known as Strangers and Brothers. His most widely read book is probably The Masters, number four in the cycle; while his latest novel, The Affair, is number eight. The series deals with the machinations in the upper-middle-class English world of education, government, and science. In effect, Snow seems set upon the commendable task of making the other practical scientists as popular as the psychia¬ trist in today's literary market. When such an awesomely equipped spokesman says, I believe the intellectual life of the whole of western society is in¬ creasingly being split into polar groups and there is the a gulf of mutual incomprehension that is doing great harm, it behooves us to listen. Snow's idea that scientists comprise a unified culture requires amplification. Cer¬ tainly, the gulf between the different sciences is often as great as that between the scientists and the literati. Attendance at a meeting of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology will suffice to demon¬ strate what a Tower of Babel the natural sciences, in all their subdivisions, can create among themselves. In the field of medicine. the scientific split is manifest in the faltering dialogue between the research academicians and the private practitioners. In spite of these intragroup differences, scientists share attitudes, common standards and patterns of behavior, common approaches and assumptions. ... In their working, and in much of their emotional life, their atti¬ tudes are closer to other scientists than to non-scientists. .
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Expert‐Based Information and Policy Subsystems: A Review and Synthesis
Weible, C. M. (2008) · Policy Studies Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1541-0072.2008.00287.x · Cited by 470
Gauch Jr, H. G. (2002) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511815034 · Cited by 385
Midstream Modulation of Technology: Governance From Within
Fisher, E., Mahajan, R. L., & Mitcham, C. (2006) · Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society · doi:10.1177/0270467606295402 · Cited by 373
CHALMERS, D. J., FRENCH, R. M., & HOFSTADTER, D. R. (1992) · Journal of Experimental & Theoretical Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1080/09528139208953747 · Cited by 333
Hope: its nature and measurement
Scioli, A., Ricci, M., Nyugen, T., & Scioli, E. R. (2011) · Psychology of Religion and Spirituality · doi:10.1037/a0020903 · Cited by 180
Metadata
- Authors
- Snow, C. P., & Smoluchowski, R.
- Venue
- Physics Today
- Publisher
- AIP Publishing
- Published
- 1961-09-01
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 62-63
- ISSN
- 0031-9228 (ISSN-L)
- 1945-0699
- OpenAlex
- W2056758376
- Cited by
- 1,479
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 178.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Two Cultures and the Scientific Revolution. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1063/1.3057748
- The paper
- Snow, C. P., & Smoluchowski, R. (1961). The Two Cultures and the Scientific Revolution. Physics Today. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3057748
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.