The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The influence of hydrodynamic slip on the electrophoretic mobility of a spherical colloidal particle
Abstract
Recent theoretical studies have suggested a significant enhancement in electro-osmotic flows over hydrodynamically slipping surfaces, and experiments have indeed measured O(1) enhancements. In this paper, we investigate whether an equivalent effect occurs in the electrophoretic motion of a colloidal particle whose surface exhibits hydrodynamic slip. To this end, we compute the electrophoretic mobility of a uniformly charged spherical particle with slip length λ as a function of the zeta (or surface) potential of the particle ζ and diffuse-layer thickness κ−1. In the case of a thick diffuse layer, κa⪡1 (where a is the particle size), simple arguments show that slip does lead to an O(1) enhancement in the mobility, owing to the reduced viscous drag on the particle. On the other hand, for a thin-diffuse layer κa⪢1, the situation is more complicated. A detailed asymptotic analysis, following the method of O’Brien [J. Colloid Interface Sci. 92, 204 (1983)], reveals that an O(κλ) increase in the mobility occurs at low-to-moderate zeta potentials (with ζ measured on the scale of thermal voltage kBT/e≈25 mV). However, as ζ is further increased, the mobility decreases and ultimately becomes independent of the slip length—the enhancement is lost—which is due to the importance of nonuniform surface conduction within the thin-diffuse layer, at large ζ and large, but finite, κa. Our asymptotic calculations for thick and thin-diffuse layers are corroborated and bridged by computation of the mobility from the numerical solution of the full electrokinetic equations (using the method of O’Brien and White [J. Chem. Soc., Faraday Trans. 2 74, 1607 (1978)]). In summary, then, we demonstrate that hydrodynamic slip can indeed produce an enhancement in the electrophoretic mobility; however, such enhancements will not be as dramatic as the previously studied κa→∞ limit would suggest. Importantly, this conclusion applies not only to electrophoresis but also to electro-osmosis over highly charged surfaces, wherein any inhomogeneities (e.g., due to curvature, roughness, charge patterning, or a variation in slip length) will drive nonuniform surface conduction, which prevents the significant slip-driven flow enhancements predicted for a uniform highly charged surface.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Wettability of porous surfaces
Cassie, A. B. D., & Baxter, S. (1944) · Transactions of the Faraday Society · doi:10.1039/tf9444000546 · Cited by 13,807
Cited by
Osmosis, from molecular insights to large-scale applications
Marbach, S., & Bocquet, L. (2019) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c8cs00420j · Cited by 316
Induced-charge electrokinetic phenomena
Bazant, M. Z., & Squires, T. M. (2010) · Current Opinion in Colloid & Interface Science · doi:10.1016/j.cocis.2010.01.003 · Cited by 283
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Khair, A. S., & Squires, T. M.
- Venue
- Physics of Fluids
- Publisher
- AIP Publishing
- Published
- 2009-04-01
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 4
- ISSN
- 1070-6631 (ISSN-L)
- 1089-7666
- OpenAlex
- W2031577388
- Cited by
- 159
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 4.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The influence of hydrodynamic slip on the electrophoretic mobility of a spherical colloidal particle. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1063/1.3116664
- The paper
- Khair, A. S., & Squires, T. M. (2009). The influence of hydrodynamic slip on the electrophoretic mobility of a spherical colloidal particle. Physics of Fluids. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3116664
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.