The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Neural network approach to quantum-chemistry data: Accurate prediction of density functional theory energies
Abstract
Artificial neural network (ANN) approach has been applied to estimate the density functional theory (DFT) energy with large basis set using lower-level energy values and molecular descriptors. A total of 208 different molecules were used for the ANN training, cross validation, and testing by applying BLYP, B3LYP, and BMK density functionals. Hartree–Fock results were reported for comparison. Furthermore, constitutional molecular descriptor (CD) and quantum-chemical molecular descriptor (QD) were used for building the calibration model. The neural network structure optimization, leading to four to five hidden neurons, was also carried out. The usage of several low-level energy values was found to greatly reduce the prediction error. An expected error, mean absolute deviation, for ANN approximation to DFT energies was 0.6±0.2 kcal mol−1. In addition, the comparison of the different density functionals with the basis sets and the comparison of multiple linear regression results were also provided. The CDs were found to overcome limitation of the QD. Furthermore, the effective ANN model for DFT/6-311G(3df,3pd) and DFT/6-311G(2df,2pd) energy estimation was developed, and the benchmark results were provided.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Self-consistent molecular orbital methods. XX. A basis set for correlated wave functions
Krishnan, R., Binkley, J. S., Seeger, R., & Pople, J. A. (1980) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.438955 · Cited by 17,772
Handbook of Molecular Descriptors
Todeschini, R., & Consonni, V. (2000) · Methods and Principles in Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1002/9783527613106 · Cited by 4,107
Molecular Electronic‐Structure Theory
Helgaker, T., Jørgensen, P., & Olsen, J. (2000) · doi:10.1002/9781119019572 · Cited by 2,594
Cited by
Big Data Meets Quantum Chemistry Approximations: The Δ-Machine Learning Approach
Ramakrishnan, R., Dral, P. O., Rupp, M., & von Lilienfeld, O. A. (2015) · Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation · doi:10.1021/acs.jctc.5b00099 · Cited by 911
Neural network potential-energy surfaces in chemistry: a tool for large-scale simulations
Behler, J. (2011) · Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics · doi:10.1039/c1cp21668f · Cited by 781
Machine learning of molecular electronic properties in chemical compound space
Montavon, G., Rupp, M., Gobre, V., Vazquez-Mayagoitia, A., Hansen, K., Tkatchenko, A., Müller, K.-R., & Anatole von Lilienfeld, O. (2013) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/15/9/095003 · Cited by 623
Assessment and Validation of Machine Learning Methods for Predicting Molecular Atomization Energies
Hansen, K., Montavon, G., Biegler, F., Fazli, S., Rupp, M., Scheffler, M., von Lilienfeld, O. A., Tkatchenko, A., & Müller, K.-R. (2013) · Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation · doi:10.1021/ct400195d · Cited by 613
Quantum Chemistry in the Age of Machine Learning
Dral, P. O. (2020) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters · doi:10.1021/acs.jpclett.9b03664 · Cited by 417
Metadata
- Authors
- Balabin, R. M., & Lomakina, E. I.
- Venue
- The Journal of Chemical Physics
- Publisher
- AIP Publishing
- Published
- 2009-08-17
- Volume
- 131
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 074104-074104
- ISSN
- 0021-9606 (ISSN-L)
- 1089-7690
- OpenAlex
- W2035912401
- Cited by
- 169
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 6.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Neural network approach to quantum-chemistry data: Accurate prediction of density functional theory energies. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1063/1.3206326
- The paper
- Balabin, R. M., & Lomakina, E. I. (2009). Neural network approach to quantum-chemistry data: Accurate prediction of density functional theory energies. The Journal of Chemical Physics. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3206326
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.