Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 362

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Band bowing and band alignment in InGaN alloys

Moses, Poul Georg, Van de Walle, Chris G.·2010·Applied Physics Letters

Abstract

We use density functional theory calculations with the HSE06 hybrid exchange-correlation functional to investigate InGaN alloys and accurately determine band gaps and band alignments. We find a strong band-gap bowing at low In content. Band positions on an absolute energy scale are determined from surface calculations. The resulting GaN/InN valence-band offset is 0.62 eV. The dependence of InGaN valence-band alignment on In content is found to be almost linear. Based on the values of band gaps and band alignments, we conclude that InGaN fulfills the requirements for a photoelectrochemical electrode for In contents up to 50%.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1063/1.3291055

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 362

Metadata

Authors
Moses, P. G., & Van de Walle, C. G.
Venue
Applied Physics Letters
Published
2010-01-11
Volume
96
Issue
2
ISSN
  • 0003-6951 (ISSN-L)
  • 1077-3118
OpenAlex
W2015976204
Cited by
362
References
0
FWCI
19.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Band bowing and band alignment in InGaN alloys. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1063/1.3291055
The paper
Moses, P. G., & Van de Walle, C. G. (2010). Band bowing and band alignment in InGaN alloys. Applied Physics Letters. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3291055

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.