Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 349

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The shear viscosity of rigid water models

González, Miguel Angel, Abascal, José L. F.·2010·The Journal of Chemical Physics

Abstract

In this work, the shear viscosity at ambient conditions of several water models (SPC/E, TIP4P, TIP5P, and TIP4P/2005) is evaluated using the Green–Kubo formalism. The performance of TIP4P/2005 is excellent, that of SPC/E and TIP5P is more or less acceptable, whereas TIP4P and especially TIP3P give a poor agreement with experiment. Further calculations have been carried out for TIP4P/2005 to provide a wider assessment of its performance. In accordance with experimental data, TIP4P/2005 predicts a minimum in the shear viscosity for the 273 K isotherm, a shift in the minimum toward lower pressures at 298 K, and its disappearance at 373 K.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1063/1.3330544

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 349

Metadata

Authors
González, M. A., & Abascal, J. L. F.
Venue
The Journal of Chemical Physics
Published
2010-03-03
Volume
132
Issue
9
Pages
096101-096101
ISSN
  • 0021-9606 (ISSN-L)
  • 1089-7690
OpenAlex
W2086381852
Cited by
349
References
0
FWCI
11.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The shear viscosity of rigid water models. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1063/1.3330544
The paper
González, M. A., & Abascal, J. L. F. (2010). The shear viscosity of rigid water models. The Journal of Chemical Physics. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3330544

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.