Thermal conductivity of heavily doped low-pressure chemical vapor deposited polycrystalline silicon films
Abstract
The lateral thermal conductivity of heavily doped low-pressure chemical vapor deposited polycrystalline silicon films is measured using polycrystalline silicon microbridges elevated three micrometers above a silicon substrate. The bridges, lightly doped in their central regions and heavily doped elsewhere, are fabricated using a sacrificial silicon-dioxide layer and phosphorus out-diffusion from doped oxide. Voltage-current characteristics measured on the bridges both under high vacuum and in silicone oil are used to calculate lateral thermal conductivity in the polycrystalline silicon. The experimental values for the thermal conductivity of heavily doped polycrystalline silicon range from 0.29 to 0.34 W cm−1 K−1 and average 0.32 W cm−1 K−1. These values agree closely with results obtained by a second method that employs uniformly doped polycrystalline silicon bridges. In the second method, high-vacuum, voltage-current characteristics are measured and the indicated thermal conductivities for two samples are 0.29 and 0.30 W cm−1 K−1, respectively.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Electrical resistance thermometry has been applied to measure the thermal conductivity of low-dimensional solids in both direct and modulated current configurations.
“Electrical resistance thermometry has been applied to measure the thermal conductivity of low dimensional solids (films, membranes, wires, and bridges) [13-15] in both direct [16-20] and modulated (1-omega, 2-omega, 3-omega) [21,22] current configurations.”
From Mean Free Path Effects on the Experimentally Measured Thermal Conductivity of Single-Crystal Silicon Microbridges (2013) · cites this paper as [16]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 4 · Cited by 137
- Authors
- Tai, Y. C., Mastrangelo, C. H., & Muller, R. S.
- Affiliations
- University of California, Berkeley (US)
- Venue
- Journal of Applied Physics
- Publisher
- AIP Publishing
- Published
- 1988-03-01
- Volume
- 63
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1442-1447
- ISSN
- 0021-8979 (ISSN-L)
- 1089-7550
- OpenAlex
- W2082948558
- Cited by
- 137
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 1.74
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Update notices
- correction (1989-10-01)
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Applied Physics (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Thermal properties of materials
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Advanced MEMS and NEMS Technologies
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Semiconductor materials and interfaces
- Keywords
- thermal conductivity, polycrystalline silicon thin films, low-pressure chemical vapor deposition, heavily doped silicon, microbridges, current-voltage characteristics, silicone oil
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review