The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Impulse coupling to targets in vacuum by KrF, HF, and CO2 single-pulse lasers
Abstract
We present a laser-target scaling model which permits approximate prediction of the dependence of ablation pressure, mechanical coupling coefficient, and related parameters in vacuum upon single-pulse laser intensity (I), wavelength (λ), and pulse width (τ) over extremely broad ranges. We show that existing data for vacuum mechanical coupling coefficient for metallic and endothermic nonmetallic, surface-absorbing planar targets follows this empirical trend to within a factor of 2 over 7 orders of magnitude in the product (Iλ(τ)1/2). The comparison we present is valid for intensity equal to or greater than the peak-coupling intensity Imax, where dense plasma formation mediates laser-target coupling. Mechanical coupling coefficients studied ranged over two orders of magnitude. The data supporting this trend represent intensities from 3 MW/cm2 to 70 TW/cm2, pulse widths from 1.5 ms to 500 ps, wavelengths from 10.6 μm to 248 nm, and pulse energies from 100 mJ to 10 kJ. With few exceptions, data approximating one-dimensional or planar expansions were selected. Previously, meaningful scaling of ablation pressure parameters with I, λ, τ was not possible because existing data concentrated in a small range of these parameters. Our own data, obtained in the low- and midrange of (Iλ(τ)1/2), completes the experimental picture. Since this new data was derived from five separate experiments with specialized character and purpose, detailed accounts of this work will appear separately. In this paper, we summarize the experimental conditions and select only those data which are relevant to the scaling issue. We find that laboratory-scale laser experiments can often give impulse coupling data which agree with results from much higher-energy experiments without much error, and at much lower cost. We review a theory of vacuum laser ablation, specialize it to a quantitative description of mechanical coupling, and show that the resulting model provides a simple physical description which comes quite close to the observed empirical trend. This is accomplished with minor elaborations of the theory as originally presented to account for the temperature dependence of plasma ionization states, while adhering to the premise that a simple and generally applicable treatment of laser impulse production should be available. The theoretical model can quantitatively predict vacuum ablation pressure for opaque targets without adjustable parameters to the factor-of-2 accuracy in which we are interested. Other published scaling models omit one or more of the important variables, lack broad applicability, or deviate more noticeably from the observed trend.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Semerok, A., Chaléard, C., Detalle, V, Lacour, J.-L., Mauchien, P., Meynadier, P., Nouvellon, C., Sallé, B., Palianov, P., Perdrix, M., et al. (1999) · Applied Surface Science · doi:10.1016/s0169-4332(98)00411-5 · Cited by 218
Kudryashov, S. I., Nastulyavichus, A. A., Ivanova, A. K., Smirnov, N. A., Khmelnitskiy, R. A., Rudenko, A. A., Saraeva, I. N., Tolordava, E. R., Yu. Kharin, A., Zavestovskaya, I. N., et al. (2019) · Applied Surface Science · doi:10.1016/j.apsusc.2018.11.201 · Cited by 26
Nastulyavichus, A., Smirnov, N., & Kudryashov, S. (2022) · Chinese Physics B · doi:10.1088/1674-1056/ac5602 · Cited by 12
Metadata
- Authors
- Phipps, C. R., Turner, T. P., Harrison, R. F., York, G. W., Osborne, W. Z., Anderson, G. K., Corlis, X. F., Haynes, L. C., Steele, H. S., Spicochi, K. C., & King, T. R.
- Venue
- Journal of Applied Physics
- Publisher
- AIP Publishing
- Published
- 1988-08-01
- Volume
- 64
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 1083-1096
- ISSN
- 0021-8979 (ISSN-L)
- 1089-7550
- OpenAlex
- W1978038889
- Cited by
- 441
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.