Cited by 26Spacecraft and Cryogenic TechnologiesAerogels and thermal insulationGas Dynamics and Kinetic Theory

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

ANALYSIS AND TESTING OF MULTILAYER AND AEROGEL INSULATION CONFIGURATIONS

Open access
Johnson, W. L., Demko, J. A., Fesmire, J. E., Weisend, J. G.·2010·AIP Conference Proceedings

Abstract

Multilayer insulation systems that have robust operational characteristics have long been a goal of many research projects. Such thermal insulation systems may need to offer some degree of structural support and/or mechanical integrity during loss of vacuum scenarios while continuing to provide insulative value to the vessel. Aerogel‐based composite blankets can be the best insulation materials in ambient pressure environments; in high vacuum, the thermal performance of aerogel improves by about one order of magnitude. Standard multilayer insulation (MLI) is typically 50% worse at ambient pressure and at soft vacuum, but as much as two or three orders of magnitude better at high vacuum. Different combinations of aerogel blanket and multilayer insulation materials have been tested at the Cryogenics Test Laboratory of NASA Kennedy Space Center. Analysis performed at Oak Ridge National Laboratory showed an importance to the relative location of the MLI and aerogel blankets. Apparent thermal conductivity testing under cryogenic‐vacuum conditions was performed to verify the analytical conclusion. Tests results are shown to be in agreement with the analysis which indicated that the best performance is obtained with aerogel layers located in the middle of the blanket insulation system.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1063/1.3422431

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Johnson, W. L., Demko, J. A., Fesmire, J. E., & Weisend, J. G.
Affiliations
Oak Ridge National Laboratory (US)
Venue
AIP Conference Proceedings
Publisher
AIP
Published
2010
Pages
780-787
ISSN
0094-243X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2016298990
Cited by
26
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2012: 2
FWCI
2.55
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
AIP conference proceedings (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Spacecraft and Cryogenic Technologies
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Aerogels and thermal insulation
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Applied Mathematics › Gas Dynamics and Kinetic Theory
Keywords
multilayer insulation, aerogel insulation, cryogenic insulation, thermal conductivity, vacuum insulation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review