The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Benchmarks of electronically excited states: Basis set effects on CASPT2 results
Abstract
Vertical excitation energies and one-electron properties are computed for the valence excited states of 28 medium-sized organic benchmark molecules using multistate multiconfigurational second-order perturbation theory (MS-CASPT2) and the augmented correlation-consistent aug-cc-pVTZ basis set. They are compared with previously reported MS-CASPT2 results obtained with the smaller TZVP basis. The basis set extension from TZVP to aug-cc-pVTZ causes rather minor and systematic shifts in the vertical excitation energies that are normally slightly reduced (on average by 0.11 eV for the singlets and by 0.09 eV for the triplets), whereas the changes in the calculated oscillator strengths and dipole moments are somewhat more pronounced on a relative scale. These basis set effects at the MS-CASPT2 level are qualitatively and quantitatively similar to those found at the coupled cluster level for the same set of benchmark molecules. The previously proposed theoretical best estimates (TBE-1) for the vertical excitation energies for 104 singlet and 63 triplet excited states of the benchmark molecules are upgraded by replacing TZVP with aug-cc-pVTZ data that yields a new reference set (TBE-2). Statistical evaluations of the performance of density functional theory (DFT) and semiempirical methods lead to the same ranking and very similar quantitative results for TBE-1 and TBE-2, with slightly better performance measures with respect to TBE-2. DFT/MRCI is most accurate among the investigated DFT-based approaches, while the OMx methods with orthogonalization corrections perform best at the semiempirical level.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Laurent, A. D., & Jacquemin, D. (2013) · International Journal of Quantum Chemistry · doi:10.1002/qua.24438 · Cited by 1,382
Improta, R., Santoro, F., & Blancafort, L. (2016) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00444 · Cited by 499
Influence of Triplet Instabilities in TDDFT
Peach, M. J. G., Williamson, M. J., & Tozer, D. J. (2011) · Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation · doi:10.1021/ct200651r · Cited by 384
Combining Wave Function Methods with Density Functional Theory for Excited States
Ghosh, S., Verma, P., Cramer, C. J., Gagliardi, L., & Truhlar, D. G. (2018) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00193 · Cited by 253
Metadata
- Authors
- Silva-Junior, M. R., Schreiber, M., Sauer, S. P. A., & Thiel, W.
- Venue
- The Journal of Chemical Physics
- Publisher
- AIP Publishing
- Published
- 2010-11-05
- Volume
- 133
- Issue
- 17
- Pages
- 174318-174318
- ISSN
- 0021-9606 (ISSN-L)
- 1089-7690
- OpenAlex
- W2092446695
- Cited by
- 246
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Benchmarks of electronically excited states: Basis set effects on CASPT2 results. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1063/1.3499598
- The paper
- Silva-Junior, M. R., Schreiber, M., Sauer, S. P. A., & Thiel, W. (2010). Benchmarks of electronically excited states: Basis set effects on CASPT2 results. The Journal of Chemical Physics. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3499598
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.