The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Breaking the carbon dimer: The challenges of multiple bond dissociation with full configuration interaction quantum Monte Carlo methods
Abstract
The full configuration interaction quantum Monte Carlo (FCIQMC) method, as well as its “initiator” extension (i-FCIQMC), is used to tackle the complex electronic structure of the carbon dimer across the entire dissociation reaction coordinate, as a prototypical example of a strongly correlated molecular system. Various basis sets of increasing size up to the large cc-pVQZ are used, spanning a fully accessible N-electron basis of over 1012 Slater determinants, and the accuracy of the method is demonstrated in each basis set. Convergence to the FCI limit is achieved in the largest basis with only \documentclass[12pt]{minimal}\begin{document}$\mathcal {O}[10^7]$\end{document}O[107] walkers within random errorbars of a few tenths of a millihartree across the binding curve, and extensive comparisons to FCI, CCSD(T), MRCI, and CEEIS results are made where possible. A detailed exposition of the convergence properties of the FCIQMC methods is provided, considering convergence with elapsed imaginary time, number of walkers and size of the basis. Various symmetries which can be incorporated into the stochastic dynamic, beyond the standard abelian point group symmetry and spin polarisation are also described. These can have significant benefit to the computational effort of the calculations, as well as the ability to converge to various excited states. The results presented demonstrate a new benchmark accuracy in basis-set energies for systems of this size, significantly improving on previous state of the art estimates.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Density matrix formulation for quantum renormalization groups
White, S. R. (1992) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.69.2863 · Cited by 7,702
Molecular Electronic‐Structure Theory
Helgaker, T., Jørgensen, P., & Olsen, J. (2000) · doi:10.1002/9781119019572 · Cited by 2,594
Constrained path Monte Carlo method for fermion ground states
Zhang, S., Carlson, J., & Gubernatis, J. E. (1997) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.55.7464 · Cited by 388
Cited by
OpenMolcas: From Source Code to Insight
Fdez. Galván, I., Vacher, M., Alavi, A., Angeli, C., Aquilante, F., Autschbach, J., Bao, J. J., Bokarev, S. I., Bogdanov, N. A., Carlson, R. K., et al. (2019) · Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation · doi:10.1021/acs.jctc.9b00532 · Cited by 1,114
Self-citationThe Variational Quantum Eigensolver: A review of methods and best practices
Tilly, J., Chen, H., Cao, S., Picozzi, D., Setia, K., Li, Y., Grant, E., Wossnig, L., Rungger, I., Booth, G. H., et al. (2022) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2022.08.003 · Cited by 1,031
Self-citationThe Shape of Full Configuration Interaction to Come
Eriksen, J. J. (2021) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters · doi:10.1021/acs.jpclett.0c03225 · Cited by 66
Metadata
- Authors
- Booth, G. H., Cleland, D., Thom, A. J. W., & Alavi, A.
- Venue
- The Journal of Chemical Physics
- Publisher
- AIP Publishing
- Published
- 2011-08-22
- Volume
- 135
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 084104-084104
- ISSN
- 0021-9606 (ISSN-L)
- 1089-7690
- OpenAlex
- W2036060950
- Cited by
- 160
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 4.87
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Breaking the carbon dimer: The challenges of multiple bond dissociation with full configuration interaction quantum Monte Carlo methods. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1063/1.3624383
- The paper
- Booth, G. H., Cleland, D., Thom, A. J. W., & Alavi, A. (2011). Breaking the carbon dimer: The challenges of multiple bond dissociation with full configuration interaction quantum Monte Carlo methods. The Journal of Chemical Physics. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3624383
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.