The DOI matches its Crossref record.
An overlap fitted chain of spheres exchange method
Abstract
The “chain of spheres” (COS) algorithm, as part of the RIJCOSX SCF procedure, approximates the exchange term by performing analytic integration with respect to the coordinates of only one of the two electrons, whereas for the remaining coordinates, integration is carried out numerically. In the present work, we attempt to enhance the efficiency of the method by minimizing numerical errors in the COS procedure. The main idea is based on the work of Friesner and consists of finding a fitting matrix, \documentclass[12pt]{minimal}\begin{document}$\mathbf {Q}$\end{document}Q, which leads the numerical and analytically evaluated overlap matrices to coincide. Using \documentclass[12pt]{minimal}\begin{document}$\mathbf {Q}$\end{document}Q, the evaluation of exchange integrals can indeed be improved. Improved results and timings are obtained with the present default grid setup for both single point calculations and geometry optimizations. The fitting procedure results in a reduction of grid sizes necessary for achieving chemical accuracy. We demonstrate this by testing a number of grids and comparing results to the fully analytic and the earlier COS approximations. This turns out to be favourable for total and reaction energies, for which chemical accuracy can now be reached with a corresponding ∼30% speedup over the original RIJCOSX procedure for single point energies. Results are slightly less favourable for the accuracy of geometry optimizations, but the procedure is still shown to yield geometries with errors well below the method inherent errors of the employed theoretical framework.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Software update: The ORCA program system—Version 5.0
Neese, F. (2022) · WIREs Computational Molecular Science · doi:10.1002/wcms.1606 · Cited by 4,963
Self-citationGoerigk, L., Hansen, A., Bauer, C., Ehrlich, S., Najibi, A., & Grimme, S. (2017) · Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics · doi:10.1039/c7cp04913g · Cited by 1,894
Natural triple excitations in local coupled cluster calculations with pair natural orbitals
Riplinger, C., Sandhoefer, B., Hansen, A., & Neese, F. (2013) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.4821834 · Cited by 1,885
Self-citationRecent developments in the P y SCF program package
Sun, Q., Zhang, X., Banerjee, S., Bao, P., Barbry, M., Blunt, N. S., Bogdanov, N. A., Booth, G. H., Chen, J., Cui, Z.-H., et al. (2020) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/5.0006074 · Cited by 1,259
An improved chain of spheres for exchange algorithm
Helmich-Paris, B., de Souza, B., Neese, F., & Izsák, R. (2021) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/5.0058766 · Cited by 573
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Izsák, R., & Neese, F.
- Venue
- The Journal of Chemical Physics
- Publisher
- AIP Publishing
- Published
- 2011-10-11
- Volume
- 135
- Issue
- 14
- Pages
- 144105-144105
- ISSN
- 0021-9606 (ISSN-L)
- 1089-7690
- OpenAlex
- W2004575088
- Cited by
- 941
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: An overlap fitted chain of spheres exchange method. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1063/1.3646921
- The paper
- Izsák, R., & Neese, F. (2011). An overlap fitted chain of spheres exchange method. The Journal of Chemical Physics. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3646921
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.