The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Ultraviolet laser ablation of polymers: spot size, pulse duration, and plume attenuation effects explained
Abstract
A versatile model for ultraviolet (UV) laser ablation of polymers is presented, which is very successfully applied to the calculation of a variety of different properties of this process, including the influence of plume attenuation dynamics. The polymer is described as a system of chromophores with two possible electronic states. The model is based on the combination of photothermal decomposition and photodissociative bond breaking in the electronically excited state. Laser induced chemical modifications are incorporated via different absorption coefficients for the initial and for the modified polymer after absorption of UV light. Dynamic attenuation of the expanding ablation plume and heat conduction are taken into account. The results of the theoretical calculations are compared with the results of three different series of experiments performed with polyimide (PI) and polymethylmethacrylate at the excimer laser wavelength 248 nm and with PI also at 308 nm: (1) Measurement of the ablation rate as a function of fluence for four different pulse durations between 20 and 250 ns; (2) Measurements of the ablation rate as a function of fluence for five different laser irradiation spot radii between 10 and 150 μm, and (3) Time resolved measurement of the dynamic plume attenuation at the ablating laser wavelength as a function of fluence for four different pulse durations between 20 and 250 ns. The model leads to a prediction of etch rates, ablation thresholds, plume attenuation, and surface temperatures during the ablation process, which is in good agreement with the experimental results. The observed increase of the ablation rate with increasing pulse length and with decreasing laser spot size can be explained by the model as a consequence of laser induced modified absorption in combination with the dynamic shielding of the expanding plume.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Mechanisms of Pulsed Laser Ablation of Biological Tissues
Vogel, A., & Venugopalan, V. (2003) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr010379n · Cited by 1,918
Laser‐Induced Graphene Formation on Wood
Ye, R., Chyan, Y., Zhang, J., Li, Y., Han, X., Kittrell, C., & Tour, J. M. (2017) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.201702211 · Cited by 665
Schaaf, P. (2002) · Progress in Materials Science · doi:10.1016/s0079-6425(00)00003-7 · Cited by 345
Scaramuzza, S., Zerbetto, M., & Amendola, V. (2016) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry C · doi:10.1021/acs.jpcc.6b00161 · Cited by 100
Metadata
- Authors
- Schmidt, H., Ihlemann, J., Wolff-Rottke, B., Luther, K., & Troe, J.
- Venue
- Journal of Applied Physics
- Publisher
- AIP Publishing
- Published
- 1998-05-15
- Volume
- 83
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 5458-5468
- ISSN
- 0021-8979 (ISSN-L)
- 1089-7550
- OpenAlex
- W2079342055
- Cited by
- 161
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Ultraviolet laser ablation of polymers: spot size, pulse duration, and plume attenuation effects explained. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1063/1.367377
- The paper
- Schmidt, H., Ihlemann, J., Wolff-Rottke, B., Luther, K., & Troe, J. (1998). Ultraviolet laser ablation of polymers: spot size, pulse duration, and plume attenuation effects explained. Journal of Applied Physics. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.367377
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.