The DOI matches its Crossref record; 49 of the 49 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Revised self-consistent continuum solvation in electronic-structure calculations
Open accessAbstract
The solvation model proposed by Fattebert and Gygi [J. Comput. Chem. 23, 662 (2002)10.1002/jcc.10069] and Scherlis et al. [J. Chem. Phys. 124, 074103 (2006)10.1063/1.2168456] is reformulated, overcoming some of the numerical limitations encountered and extending its range of applicability. We first recast the problem in terms of induced polarization charges that act as a direct mapping of the self-consistent continuum dielectric; this allows to define a functional form for the dielectric that is well behaved both in the high-density region of the nuclear charges and in the low-density region where the electronic wavefunctions decay into the solvent. Second, we outline an iterative procedure to solve the Poisson equation for the quantum fragment embedded in the solvent that does not require multigrid algorithms, is trivially parallel, and can be applied to any Bravais crystallographic system. Last, we capture some of the non-electrostatic or cavitation terms via a combined use of the quantum volume and quantum surface [M. Cococcioni, F. Mauri, G. Ceder, and N. Marzari, Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 145501 (2005)10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.145501] of the solute. The resulting self-consistent continuum solvation model provides a very effective and compact fit of computational and experimental data, whereby the static dielectric constant of the solvent and one parameter allow to fit the electrostatic energy provided by the polarizable continuum model with a mean absolute error of 0.3 kcal/mol on a set of 240 neutral solutes. Two parameters allow to fit experimental solvation energies on the same set with a mean absolute error of 1.3 kcal/mol. A detailed analysis of these results, broken down along different classes of chemical compounds, shows that several classes of organic compounds display very high accuracy, with solvation energies in error of 0.3-0.4 kcal/mol, whereby larger discrepancies are mostly limited to self-dissociating species and strong hydrogen-bond-forming compounds.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
QUANTUM ESPRESSO: a modular and open-source software project for quantum simulations of materials
Giannozzi, P., Baroni, S., Bonini, N., Calandra, M., Car, R., Cavazzoni, C., Ceresoli, D., Chiarotti, G. L., Cococcioni, M., Dabo, I., et al. (2009) · Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter · doi:10.1088/0953-8984/21/39/395502 · Cited by 29,281
Self-citationvan der Waals Volumes and Radii
Bondi, A. (1964) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry · doi:10.1021/j100785a001 · Cited by 19,350
Quantum Mechanical Continuum Solvation Models
Tomasi, J., Mennucci, B., & Cammi, R. (2005) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr9904009 · Cited by 16,868
UFF, a full periodic table force field for molecular mechanics and molecular dynamics simulations
Rappe, A. K., Casewit, C. J., Colwell, K. S., Goddard, W. A., & Skiff, W. M. (1992) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja00051a040 · Cited by 10,557
Klamt, A., & Schüürmann, G. (1993) · J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2 · doi:10.1039/p29930000799 · Cited by 9,445
Tomasi, J., & Persico, M. (1994) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr00031a013 · Cited by 5,503
Electric Moments of Molecules in Liquids
Onsager, L. (1936) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja01299a050 · Cited by 5,329
Periodic boundary conditions in ab initio calculations
Makov, G., & Payne, M. C. (1995) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.51.4014 · Cited by 2,994
Continuous surface charge polarizable continuum models of solvation. I. General formalism
Scalmani, G., & Frisch, M. J. (2010) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.3359469 · Cited by 2,716
Convergence acceleration of iterative sequences. the case of scf iteration
Pulay, P. (1980) · Chemical Physics Letters · doi:10.1016/0009-2614(80)80396-4 · Cited by 2,612
Cited by
Advanced capabilities for materials modelling with Q uantum ESPRESSO
Giannozzi, P., Andreussi, O., Brumme, T., Bunau, O., Buongiorno Nardelli, M., Calandra, M., Car, R., Cavazzoni, C., Ceresoli, D., Cococcioni, M., et al. (2017) · Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter · doi:10.1088/1361-648x/aa8f79 · Cited by 8,361
Self-citationKühne, T. D., Iannuzzi, M., Del Ben, M., Rybkin, V. V., Seewald, P., Stein, F., Laino, T., Khaliullin, R. Z., Schütt, O., Schiffmann, F., et al. (2020) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/5.0007045 · Cited by 4,468
Implicit solvation model for density-functional study of nanocrystal surfaces and reaction pathways
Mathew, K., Sundararaman, R., Letchworth-Weaver, K., Arias, T. A., & Hennig, R. G. (2014) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.4865107 · Cited by 3,196
Electric Field Effects in Electrochemical CO 2 Reduction
Chen, L. D., Urushihara, M., Chan, K., & Nørskov, J. K. (2016) · ACS Catalysis · doi:10.1021/acscatal.6b02299 · Cited by 702
Assessing a First-Principles Model of an Electrochemical Interface by Comparison with Experiment
Steinmann, S. N., & Sautet, P. (2016) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry C · doi:10.1021/acs.jpcc.6b01938 · Cited by 120
Metadata
- Authors
- Andreussi, O., Dabo, I., & Marzari, N.
- Venue
- The Journal of Chemical Physics
- Publisher
- AIP Publishing
- Published
- 2012-02-08
- Volume
- 136
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 064102-064102
- ISSN
- 0021-9606 (ISSN-L)
- 1089-7690
- OpenAlex
- W2054308726
- Cited by
- 538
- References
- 49
- FWCI
- 6.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Revised self-consistent continuum solvation in electronic-structure calculations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1063/1.3676407
- The paper
- Andreussi, O., Dabo, I., & Marzari, N. (2012). Revised self-consistent continuum solvation in electronic-structure calculations. The Journal of Chemical Physics. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3676407
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.