The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Contact analysis of elastic-plastic fractal surfaces
Abstract
Rough surfaces are characterized by fractal geometry using a modified two-variable Weierstrass–Mandelbrot function. The developed algorithm yields three-dimensional fractal surface topographies representative of engineering rough surfaces. This surface model is incorporated into an elastic-plastic contact mechanics analysis of two approaching rough surfaces. Closed form solutions for the elastic and plastic components of the total normal force and real contact area are derived in terms of fractal parameters, material properties, and mean surface separation distance. The effects of surface topography parameters and material properties on the total deformation force are investigated by comparing results from two- and three-dimensional contact analyses and elastic and elastic-perfectly plastic material behaviors. For normal contact of elastic-perfectly plastic silica surfaces and range of surface interference examined, the interfacial force is predominantly elastic and the real contact area is approximately one percent of the apparent contact area or less, depending on the mean interfacial distance. The analysis can be easily modified to account for anisotropic fractal surfaces and different material behaviors.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Fractal Geometry of Nature
Mandelbrot, B. B., & Wheeler, J. A. (1983) · American Journal of Physics · doi:10.1119/1.13295 · Cited by 21,832
Numerical recipes in C: the art of scientific computing
(1993) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.30-5638 · Cited by 17,933
Contact of nominally flat surfaces
Greenwood, J. A., & Williamson, J. B. P. (1966) · Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspa.1966.0242 · Cited by 5,692
Random Process Model of Rough Surfaces
Nayak, P. R. (1971) · Journal of Lubrication Technology · doi:10.1115/1.3451608 · Cited by 904
On the Weierstrass-Mandelbrot fractal function
Berry, M. V., Lewis, Z. V., & Nye, J. F. (1980) · Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspa.1980.0044 · Cited by 807
Fractal characterization and simulation of rough surfaces
Majumdar, A., & Tien, C. L. (1990) · Wear · doi:10.1016/0043-1648(90)90154-3 · Cited by 796
Surface topography as a nonstationary random process
Sayles, R. S., & THOMAS, T. R. (1978) · Nature · doi:10.1038/271431a0 · Cited by 711
Cited by
ANN modelling of fractal dimension in machining
Sahoo, P., & Barman, T. K. (2012) · Mechatronics and Manufacturing Engineering · doi:10.1533/9780857095893.159 · Cited by 60
Metadata
- Authors
- Yan, W., & Komvopoulos, K.
- Venue
- Journal of Applied Physics
- Publisher
- AIP Publishing
- Published
- 1998-10-01
- Volume
- 84
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 3617-3624
- ISSN
- 0021-8979 (ISSN-L)
- 1089-7550
- OpenAlex
- W1971096739
- Cited by
- 721
- References
- 7
- FWCI
- 2.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Contact analysis of elastic-plastic fractal surfaces. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1063/1.368536
- The paper
- Yan, W., & Komvopoulos, K. (1998). Contact analysis of elastic-plastic fractal surfaces. Journal of Applied Physics. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.368536
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.