Cited by 64Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity TheoriesBlack Holes and Theoretical PhysicsRelativity and Gravitational Theory

Holomorphic Lorentzian simplicity constraints

Open access
Dupuis, Maïté, Freidel, Laurent, Livine, Etera R., Speziale, Simone·2012·Journal of Mathematical Physics

Abstract

We develop a Hamiltonian representation of the ${\mathfrak {sl}}(2,{\mathbb C})$sl(2,C) algebra on a phase space consisting of N copies of twistors, or bi-spinors. We identify a complete set of global invariants, and show that they generate a closed algebra including ${\mathfrak {gl}}(N,{\mathbb C})$gl(N,C) as a subalgebra. Then, we define the linear and quadratic simplicity constraints which reduce the spinor variables to (framed) 3d space-like polyhedra embedded in Minkowski spacetime. Finally, we introduce a new version of the simplicity constraints which (i) are holomorphic and (ii) Poisson-commute with each other, and show their equivalence to the linear and quadratic constraints.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1063/1.3692327

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The constraint solution p = γj and k = j also follows naturally from a spinor formulation of the simplicity constraints.

    “More recently, it has been shown that the constraint solution p = γj and k = j also follows naturally from a spinor formulation of the simplicity constraints [369, 156, 256].”

    From The Spin-Foam Approach to Quantum Gravity (2013) · cites this paper as [156]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 26 · Cited by 64

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [28]R. Penrose and W. Rindler, Spinors And Space-time. Vol. 2 , Cambridge, Uk: Univ. Pr. ( 1986) 501p.

Authors
Dupuis, M., Freidel, L., Livine, E. R., & Speziale, S.
Affiliations
  • École Normale Supérieure de Lyon (FR)
  • Perimeter Institute (CA)
  • Centre de Physique Théorique 4 , CNRS-Luminy Case 907, 13288 Marseille Cedex 09, France
Venue
Journal of Mathematical Physics
Published
2012-03-01
Volume
53
Issue
3
Pages
032502
ISSN
  • 0022-2488 (ISSN-L)
  • 1089-7658
OpenAlex
W2079203628
Cited by
64
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 4
FWCI
8.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Mathematical Physics (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Relativity and Gravitational Theory
Keywords
simplicity constraints, twistors, global invariants, Minkowski space, Hamiltonian formulation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review