The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A comparison of experimental determinations of electron affinities of pi charge transfer complex acceptors
Abstract
The absolute electron affinities of pi charge transfer complex acceptors have been examined and the ’’best’’ values have been chosen. All of the results obtained by the magnetron method, including the estimates for hexafluorobenzene and tetracyanoethylene, were accepted. However, the magnetron results for anthraquinone and benzoquinone are not in agreement with charge transfer complex and half-wave reduction potential data. The half-wave reduction potential data and the charge transfer complex data for all of the other acceptors for which absolute electron affinities are available were found to be consistent with the usual correlation equations and their associated assumptions. The parameters from these correlations have been used to calculate the absolute electron affinities for about 150 acceptors.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Unimolecular Electrical Rectifiers
Metzger, R. M. (2003) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr020413d · Cited by 518
Quantum mechanical tunnelling in biological systems
Devault, D. (1980) · Quarterly Reviews of Biophysics · doi:10.1017/s003358350000175x · Cited by 406
Betowski, L. D., Enlow, M., Riddick, L., & Aue, D. H. (2006) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry A · doi:10.1021/jp065785v · Cited by 49
Metadata
- Authors
- Chen, E. C. M., & Wentworth, W. E.
- Venue
- The Journal of Chemical Physics
- Publisher
- AIP Publishing
- Published
- 1975-10-15
- Volume
- 63
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 3183-3191
- ISSN
- 0021-9606 (ISSN-L)
- 1089-7690
- OpenAlex
- W2066190794
- Cited by
- 194
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A comparison of experimental determinations of electron affinities of pi charge transfer complex acceptors. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1063/1.431807
- The paper
- Chen, E. C. M., & Wentworth, W. E. (1975). A comparison of experimental determinations of electron affinities of pi charge transfer complex acceptors. The Journal of Chemical Physics. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.431807
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
